• @Coki91
    link
    English
    36 months ago

    “Ancaps arent Anarchists”

    Yes… exactly. I see you understand why they are called different things

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Ancaps are called Ancaps by Anarchists for that reason, yes, not because “anarcho-” wouldn’t otherwise be indicative of actual anarchism. Anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-primitivism, the list is endless. Luckily we got spared Anarcho-withoutadjectivesism.

      Either they’re trying to appropriate our good reputation, or they’re just clueless idiots. Or both. Very likely both.

      • @Coki91
        link
        English
        26 months ago

        Or… neither?

        Words have meanings beyond the people that use them, if the meaning is appropiate for representing something, it shall be used.

        Is not like “Phobia” is on many “Phobias” just for the sake of it.

        • @barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          No, words don’t have meaning to Ancaps or they would never have chosen the “anarcho-” prefix.

          • @Coki91
            link
            English
            26 months ago

            What would have you chosen instead then? Something more precise would be good to know.

            • @barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              Neofeudalism. Ancaps are people who want their own little fiefdoms just that instead of justifying their rule by the grace of god, they justify it by the “grace” of the unregulated market. Which they, as neolibs generally do, like to equivocate with the free market.