• Tb0n3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    372 years ago

    Second amendment means we should have anti-aircraft missiles too. This is not a joke. I am serious.

    • @CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      Honestly, even if it were legal, who would be able to afford it? It’d just mean the ultra wealthy would have even more powerful private armies. A single missile costs at least a few hundred thousand dollars, with some systems costing millions per missile. Which is unfathomably expensive when you think of what you can buy with a few million dollars.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Anti-aircraft missiles, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear SAMs, shall not be infringed.