FCC details plan to restore the net neutrality rules repealed by Ajit Pai::Democrats finally have 3-2 majority needed to regulate ISPs as common carriers.

    • @Tetsuo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      What about a new article in the constitution?

      I guess most will find this completely overkill but access to free information should be a right everybody has and no party should be able to remove that.

      I understand amending the constitution of any country should be done very carefully but keeping century old constitutions is completely dumb imo. Some articles are still relevant today others are not or would seriously benefit in being updated.

      • Dark Arc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Yes! I’ve been arguing that we need a sort of “digital bill of rights” for years now

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Yeah but not by much, the only young people there, were that weirdo Q Shaman guy

      • @Misconduct@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        And we need to demolish lobbying. The things we could accomplish if those useless and sleazy detriments to society were all put out of their jobs permanently.

      • @Hoomod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        If we can fix some gerrymanders it’ll go a long way also

        Like the shitshow that is the maps in WI, which will head to the (now) liberal controlled state Supreme Court.

    • @GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Takes 60 votes in the US Senate to beat the filibuster. Republicans will not provide the 9 votes needed.

  • @SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    I’m really glad this is being done, I just hope that it has teeth. It’s going to be very annoying when the next regime from across the aisle tries to repeal the rules again. I assume there’s not an easy way to make these rules permanent. I’m happy to be wrong about that though.

    • TheRealKuni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      There would be if we had a government focused on consumer protections. Instead we have a House too busy kicking itself in the dick to make laws, and even if they did, the laws would probably PREVENT the FCC from making Net Neutrality rules.

      • @swordsmanluke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        I thought that got blocked - or at least, tied up in court. I know there are ongoing initiatives, but isn’t the only “big” one, the one that was repaying funds -stolen- from borrowers? Like, refunding overpayments?

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel today announced plans to restore net neutrality rules similar to those that were adopted during the Obama era and then repealed by the FCC when Donald Trump was president.

    Rosenworcel announced her plans in a speech today, one day after the FCC gained a 3-2 Democratic majority with the swearing-in of Commissioner Anna Gomez.

    Similar to the previous rules, FCC officials said they don’t plan to impose rate regulation or “unbundling” requirements that would force broadband providers to share networks with other companies.

    In a fact sheet, the FCC said the proposal would “establish basic rules for Internet Service Providers that prevent them from blocking legal content, throttling your speeds, and creating fast lanes that favor those who can pay for access.”

    California enforces net neutrality rules that mirror what the FCC adopted in 2015 and beat industry attempts to get the state law overturned.

    Rosenworcel said that because FCC authority is generally centered on phone systems instead of broadband, the commission often needs “duct tape and baling wire” to provide legal justification for its rules.


    The original article contains 843 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Why did this not happen earlier? It seems there is some intentional delay for political purposes.

    • @chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      The 5th member was only just appointed earlier this month. So, they only just now have a majority. At least, that’s my understanding.

      • @evatronic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        Confirmed by the Senate. Republicans have been holding up the confirmation for quite some time. Biden nominated Anna Gomez in March of this year (link) and she was only confirmed by the Senate in early September.

        • ZeroCool
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Republicans actively working against the interests of the American people. Typical.

          • @zephyreks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            Isn’t it also an indication that the current government is unwilling to compromise? It’s not like the government not controlling the house is a new issue, but the lack of progress as a result of it seems to indicate that neither side is willing to make progress towards a shared middle ground.

        • @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Thanks. The latest delays seem to be intentional from the republicans. But march 2023 seems like far too long since January 2021. Does anyone know what happened in 2021 and 2022? I would not be surprised if it’s because of republicans again but I don’t know.

  • @Smacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    Literally can’t live without the internet these days. It needs to be a protected utility like any other.

    • @FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      No. The Republicans have stalled confirming a replacement until just now. Up until now the committee has been dead locked with 2 Democrats and two Republicans.

  • @Manmoth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Most internet companies are screwy specifically because the government helped them become regional monopolies in the first place. This will make internet more expensive and worse. What is this even trying to solve? You can get fast internet in middle of nowehere Montana with Starlink at $120/month right now.