Google has reportedly removed much of Twitter’s links from its search results after the social network’s owner Elon Musk announced reading tweets would be limited.

Search Engine Roundtable found that Google had removed 52% of Twitter links since the crackdown began last week. Twitter now blocks users who are not logged in and sets limits on reading tweets.

According to Barry Schwartz, Google reported 471 million Twitter URLs as of Friday. But by Monday morning, that number had plummeted to 227 million.

“For normal indexing of these Twitter URLs, it seems like these tweets are dropping out of the sky,” Schwartz wrote.

Platformer reported last month that Twitter refused to pay its bill for Google Cloud services.

  • @drathvedro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    952 years ago

    Good. Hopefully they remove links to pinterest, quora and facebook too while they’reat it.

    • @Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      Once upon a time Quora had reasonably accessible information. Now I find it nearly unusable and only go there as a last desperate effort which is generally fruitless. Pinterest is annoying, but generally you can still view some content. What’s annoying is trying to download, copy, or isolate content there. If all you want to do is view an image, Google can typically still pull the image out and make it viewable from the search. The problem only arises if you try to go in and see the original.

      • @MrShankles@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Thank you for typing out my exact thoughts/experience. Saved me a lot of time, not having to put too many thoughts into words.

        I’ll only add that, of course pintrest has workarounds… but I’ll usually spend more time looking for content that isn’t so “locked out”. Cause it’s a pain in my ass trying to go around it when I just wanna see examples of some random bullshit real quick. Sometimes I click a pintrest link without noticing and immediately go back to search, cause fuck that.

        Quora I still click sometimes; cause it’s like a box of coconut-filled chocolates, save only one nutella-filled chocolate… you pretty much know what you’re gonna get

      • @Tag365@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Yeah, Quora was somewhat decent, but now they force this arbitrary “All related” sort as the default setting for presenting answers and it shows answers for different questions which is nonsense. I’m looking for an answer specific to one question, so don’t show me stuff that appears somewhat related…

    • @Zithero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      Please remove Quora links…

      Every time I click a Quora link it takes me to a completely unrelated question to the one I clicked on.

      I swear that site is doing this deliberately to make it seem like it has more traffic than it does.

    • @allforthebest@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Pinterest in search results is totally cringy, but by itself it’s a very good place to find images you need and has very cool recommendation algorithms.

    • Cras
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      I have a chrome plugin to strip any Pinterest results from searches, it’s the absolute worst

    • Charcoal8645
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      What did pinterest do? Isn’t it just a bunch os pictures put together?

      • @anonforker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        some cases with pinterest result is absolute garbage and might as well better to search on search engine image instead

    • Obinice
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 years ago

      Yeah, if the content is walled off from the public, there’s not much point indexing it

      It’s a shame it’s come to this, but there are literal crazy people at the helm over at Twitter…

        • stevedidWHAT
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Would that fit with his own head cannon though?

          Elon has been a destroyer behind closed doors it’s sounds like, tough to say if it was just due to how pompous and narcissistic he is or if it was deliberate retaliation for being a whiny little spoiled brat.

    • @MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      So this decision is solely because the results can no longer be viewed by non-logged-in users.

      Glad to see (semi) confirmation of this. It’s the same reason paywall news sites are magically not paywalled (or less paywalled) when coming from a Google search. If you’re showing Google something different than what you’re showing users, Google is going to remove or down rank your results.

      What makes this more “news-worthy” is that Google and Twitter have had a great relationship for many years and Twitter is typically among the top results (for some topics). Obviously Musk has been destroying that relationship over the past year.

    • @minnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Makes a ton of sense. It only makes Google look bad when their users can’t actually view the results of their search. Imagine if the first page of a Google search was nothing but limited access stuff (paywalls, members only, etc) it would drive users to the competition really fast.

  • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Elon going to complain about another conspiracy going on while in reality it’s just that when crawlers are not able to open a certain URL they simply assume that the page doesn’t exist anymore. Google certainly didn’t “retaliate”, bots simply couldn’t find those pages anymore.

    • @danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      512 years ago

      The headline is actually wrong. Google did not do anything to Twitter. Twitter fucked up their own SEO by removing access to its content.

      • Instigate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Yeah, that’s a pretty easy and reasonable conclusion to come to if you think about if for more than five seconds. I’m not sure Elon has any toes left after he keeps shooting himself in the feet.

        • @danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          If your company cares about it’s SEO rankings, you don’t make changes like these without considering the SEO implications.

          • Madlaine
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Not even a month later and said company rebranded itself without checking trademarks. Now we have “X”, a brand that non only risks infringement of quite a few registered eu-trademarks but didn’t even apply for an own eu-trademark…

      • @Cabrio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Just like reddit. Looks like the Speztic and the Elongated Muskrat are caught in an ouroborus of like-minded stupidity.

    • @bingbong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      The latest in a seemingly never-ending series of self-owns. Apart from the stress it must put on their devs, it’s been entertaining

    • coffeetest
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Crawl issues I am sure but also user experience issues. Google is sensitive to sending visitors to sites where metrics indicate users do not, like bounce rates etc. I don’t use twt but if it is the case you have the be logged in to see anything now, a non-logged in user will click a link from Google hit a login page, and use the back button. I would assume Google will see that as a bad search result and use it less.

      • Pseu
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        If I were making a web crawler, I would make it so that if a crawler finds a domain that appears to have changed dramatically or gone offline it will re-crawl the domain and flag already-crawled pages as potentially obsolete.

  • Tygr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 years ago

    Elon, please buy Reddit and repeat your amazing ideas over there. You are so smart.

    • EuphoricPenguin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      Spez is already doing his best work to fuck over the platform. Are you certain Elon could do any better?

        • @damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          I mean there’s admiring a ruthless mob boss - and then there is admiring a petty thief that keeps getting arrested and all his plans blow up in this face.

          Spez is losing his tiny mind.

        • EuphoricPenguin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          The best part is that Elon is proving to be a pro at losing money left and right while simultaneously inventing new ways to make a social media platform suck to use.

      • @YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Oh, there’s scope to introduce “official” Reddit user badges for 10 bucks a pop and all of sorts of suicidal Musk shenanigans

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Wait until you have to be logged in to read any posts on Reddit.

          • @negativeyoda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            Honestly… We’re all (or a massive chunk of us are) Reddit refugees. I don’t give many fucks about that place. If it thrives, whatever. It’s out of my control. I’m not going to hate post here with fantasies of spez seeing it and being like, “WHYYYYY?”

            What little I’ve seen here seems like a disproportionate amount of passionate and quality users came over here. Users that were likely a bit more than casual; ie we we invested enough to use 3rd party clients, some of us are probably former mods who got disillusioned, etc.

            We’re all giddy and it is the honeymoon phase and I HOPE HOPE HOPE the users’ enthusiasm doesn’t fizzle like Mastodon seems to but I would say, just use this. Enjoy it. Post worthwhile things. I don’t think Reddit is necessarily going away, but if it’s just some weird bot riddled, low effort posts sort of place, why would we want to be there anyway?

            • Marxine
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              The fediverse will probably last as long as the internet does, if the BBS is anything to go by. And I’ve seen people starting to realize federation is an actually decent option at the very least.

    • @WldFyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      I saw people unironically saying this and being upvoted for it in hackernews, completely turned me off from the site lol

  • @jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252 years ago

    People with power shouldn’t be allowed any control over platforms that give power to “the people”. I believe this is all intentional. If it was just Twitter, or just Reddit, or just 1 TV network, I wouldn’t think that but they’re sabotaging all the mainstream platforms at once and making it incredibly obvious. They’re trying to collapse our means of communication ahead of 2024.

      • @jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Is that a Jimmy Hoffa quote? It’s not even true. If recordings popped up of them saying the quite part out loud, wouldn’t that be proof? There’s no hard evidence for a lot of ideas that are clearly true and should influence peoples decisions going forward. If we didn’t do that, we’d all be dead at the hands of people that think that line absolves them from any accountability from anyone. Terrible people aren’t dumb, they know what they shouldn’t say out loud, and they know what to say when their actions expose the truth, doesn’t mean we all have to keep them in our lives until they’re proven shitty in a court of law, that’s how domestic murder victims get made.

  • @PhoenxBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    Can someone please ELI5 what his end game is? I refuse to pay attention to twitter, but Elon, he’s crazy.

    • @DevCat@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      492 years ago

      You are assuming he has one. Before he overpaid for Twitter, he probably thought he would turn it into a successful version of TruthSocial. Then reality came knocking. Now, he may have no idea what he’s going to do.

      When you were a kid, did you ever take apart an old vacuum cleaner or power tool, thinking “I’m going to make something great out of this”? Then, when you had all the pieces lying around you, you wondered why you even started because you have no idea what you are going to do now? That may be Elon at the moment. He’s looking at the parts of his mom’s treasured vacuum cleaner, and wondering how he can blame it on the brother his parents never gave him.

      • @boopdepop@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        This pretty much sums it up for twitter I guess. Thank god we have fediverse (at least for those savvy enough) to partake in

      • @PhoenxBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Beautiful analogy.

        I can so relate to this, and it honestly does make perfect sense.

        When I was 8, I took a hacksaw to my cousins bike and ripped it in half. My plan was to make a unicycle… I only made people upset.

      • @fluke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Probably some sort of rich person scheme that he can do whereby if his multi-billion dollar mistake ends up being a failure he can write it off and no longer be on the hook for it or something.

        Like bankruptcy, but only for twitter and not himself.

        • ShustOne
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 years ago

          He can’t write off 44 billion though, he would get a tiny fraction of that and there are debts to pay back to investors.

          • @fluke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            I don’t think he’s interested ingetting it back, just to no longer be on the hook for it. I’m sure there’s no doubt various loopholes that he can use to wiggle out of the full consequences of his stupidity and hubris.

            • ShustOne
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              So when you do a write off you still are responsible for that money. It’s not declaring bankruptcy, it’s just lowering your taxable income due to loss. So “write-off” doesn’t really make much sense in this context.

              • @fluke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Maybe not the correct ‘legal’ term. But it’s splitting hairs really.

                He wants rid of his serious burden. And imagine he thinks that he can do that if he kills the platform. Instead of being on the hook for 44billion with the repayments and interest attributed to that every month, he can cut that down to a fraction.

                I’m not saying I have any idea how it works, or even if it’s possible. Mainly that I wouldn’t be surprised if it was.

      • @Zithero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Buying Twitter and tanking it lets him write off a huge amount of money for 2023 and get his taxes back from the previous year.

        Also he gets to leverage Tesla stock as the company is growing more fiscally viable… Why does that matter? Why sell before it takes off??

        Elon bought Twitter with $12.5bn in loans… Secured with the same value of Tesla stock. He didn’t sell it…

        So it’s almost free money. If the stock takes off he can make out like a bandit, pay the loan off with 1/2 the value of the real stock once it rises, but despite making money can still claim an overall loss on Twitter…

        This is why he doesn’t give a fark if Twitter lives or dies. If Twitter dies it’s a write off, but because half the investment is literally a loan against Tesla stock he still treats it like free money…

        • @Shikadi@wirebase.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          There’s a cap on loss deductions, billionaires don’t care about deducting losses. Also he didn’t buy it with Tesla stock, he put up Tesla stock as collateral.

          • @Zithero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Right…stock as collateral in a loan.

            It’s amazing what bullshit Billionaires can do.

            Also those losses are per corporate entity so he gets to use those caps multiple times on each corporation and on himself.

    • admin
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      In that case let’s thank him for spending few billions doing that! Thank you Elon :p

  • Rocket
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    It’s funny how Spez idolizes a guy who doesn’t pay his bills. It’s also funny watching the hate pplatform Twitter get absolutely destroyed by its owner. The internet in 2023 is a wild and crazily changing place.

    • @riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      At this point I’m half convinced spez was such an asshole to Reddits users because of how the community turned on his idol elon. I remember not longer than two years ago Reddit was basically musk circlejerk but this genius fucked up even that.

      • @bloopernova@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        I think it’s even stupider than that. Spez didn’t realize he pissed off the Apollo dev, and the shock of that first Apollo post made him ashamed and angry. He’s kept a lot of vitriol aimed at the Apollo dev. Spez fucked reddit because he got mad.

        • @Redtitwhore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 years ago

          That was just the tipping point. Reddit has been in a decline for a few years but we were all like frogs in boiling water but we accepted it because we didn’t know where else to go. RIF shutting down forced my hand and now I’m here. Hopefully to stay.

      • @overlordror@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        I can’t believe how fast the fediverse is growing thanks to both reddit and Twitter simultaneously imploding. I honestly welcome it, despite the growing pains this feels more like early 2000s reddit than the modern version ever did.

        Can’t wait for genZ to welcome the return of spaces that aren’t optimized for monetization over communication first.

        • @Cabrio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          As someone who spent the last 13 years browsing reddit almost entirely with RIF, if it hadn’t been for third party services I’d have left when they added awards.

        • AlexisFR
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Now we need to do the same thing with YouTube and Twitch

            • @kofe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Are there any for video/voice chat similar to discord? I feel like there are split opinions on it as a platform as they’ve made so many changes with community servers, plus their early association to Charlottesville obviously leaves concerns…but there’s definitely tons of wholesome groups where I’ve made life-long friends. I love that it’s remained ad free but don’t see that lasting

  • @assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    Doesn’t sound like retaliation to me, it sounds like their scheduled web crawlers are finding that content they used to index is now no longer viewable and this removed from search results. Pretty standard. My guess is that there were 400 million URLs listed and as the crawler uncovers that they are no longer available, that number will keep dropping to reflect only content publicly viewable. If only 500 URLs are now publicly viewable (without logins) then that’s what they will index. Google isn’t a search engine for private companies (unless you pay for the service) they are a public search engine so they make an effort to ensure that only public information is indexed. Some folk game the system (like the old expertsexchange.com) but sooner or later google drops the hammer.

    • VanillaGorilla
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      God, I hated expert sexchange so much. It was a blessing when stack overflow started.

      • detwaft
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        I’m only an amateur but I’m happy to give it a go

  • Xylight (Photon dev)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    a part of me wants this to get worse so that people finally realize elon is insane once and for all

  • @darkevilmac@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    I feel like Google is going to have to find a way to effectively index federated content at some point. The only way to really get human information is from sites like Reddit and Twitter. And both of those platforms seem to be dedicated to completely imploding at the moment.

      • @varsock@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        duckduckgo (who uses Microsoft’s index I believe) is able to find Lemmy instances already.

        problem is since every instance has its own domain you cannot search all of Lemmy or the more obscure fediverse. lemmy.world, beehaw.org, programming.dev are all different “websites”.

        I append “reddit” to my query when I want to search reddit for a human answer to a question. Can’t do that with Lemmy, unless the instance is branded as Lemmy.

        Unless there will be an org or volunteers that indexes federated instances and makes them available to search engines to they can be differentiated, finding stuff in the fediverse might be difficult…

        • Marxine
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 years ago

          Would be lovely if we could just start a search with fedi: or activityPub:

    • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Fuck Google, if Lemmy continues to take off we can just develop better search tools within the fediverse. The wider internet has been colonized, the path forward cannot rely on big tech corporations.

      I’m not a programmer/developer so I don’t even understand the scale of the work that has yet to be done. But I am deeply committed to upsetting the status quo, and this platform feels distinctly revolutionary. Can’t wait to see what the future holds for Lemmy.

      • @darkevilmac@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s all well and good to have a revolution, but if nobody knows you’re having one then nothing really changes. There are still benefits to centralised services, one of which being scale. To effectively index so much data you need scale, which is why smaller search engines tend to be just white labels of things like Bing.

        • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          100k people isn’t nobody. Centralized services can be useful at times, but there is no fundamental law preventing a decentralized system from providing the same functionality.

          The value of indexing data drops drastically when much of that data is junk, as is the case in the wider internet. Because Lemmy is a federation, there is a built in system to filter the junk.

    • @FlagonOfMe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      There’s nothing about the content being federated that makes it hard or impossible to index. Each instance is just a website with a public webpage that a bot can read. That all a search engine needs to index it. The worst case scenario is the bot will find the same content on multiple instances.

      I did read that the website is loaded entirely through JavaScript and that maybe the Google bot doesn’t execute JavaScript so can’t see the text. I don’t know if that’s still a problem in 2023, though.

      This article says it’s not a problem, but I didn’t read past the tl;dr, so maybe there’s a caveat. Like maybe it has to use a popular framework like React or something to work.

      https://searchengineland.com/tested-googlebot-crawls-javascript-heres-learned-220157

    • @DM_ME_SQUIRRELS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Isn’t it automatically indexed? I mean, I can go to lemmy.world in a browser and see the content, wouldn’t Google’s indexing bots do the same?

    • @zuccs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      It already is.

      Just put ‘site:lemmy.world’ into Google to see what it has indexed on that instance for example. I don’t think Lemmy is optimised for search yet, but I saw some GitHub threads around the topic.

    • @ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      You can tell from how many upvotes this has that there are just as many idiots here as on reddit lol

      Google can definitely index Lemmy

    • @Feweroptions@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Honestly, and I hate this, but I doubt they will. The majority of people will never go federated, even though it’s so easy, because they suck.

      • Temple Square
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        It’s the difference between a mom and pop restaurant and McDonald’s.

        We don’t need everybody to go to the mom and pop restaurant. Just enough of us to keep it afloat.

        • Marxine
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          People at large really need to remember not every kind of growth is good: it has to be sustainable, and only happen until where it’s needed.

          Unlimited growth is basically cancer, and that’s what big corpos feel to society tbh.