• @ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      how is that speculation, its material; Im only interested in ideologies with proven merit.

      Im willing to take a chance of a synthesis on a new idea, but it has to actually offer people something.

      • Dr. Jenkem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        It’s speculation because you don’t know what the future holds. And just because you’re not interested in a particular ideology or don’t think it has merit doesn’t make it any less communist.

        My only point is that words do in fact have meaning, Marxist-Leninism is not synonymous with communism. Therefore, one can be anti-tankie without being anti-communist.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          “Orthodox Marxists” can hardly be said to exist, because the classical formulation of Marxism has long been empirically refuted, hence the need for new schools. Even Luxembourgists are more respectable than “Orthodox Marxists”.

      • Dr. Jenkem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Nope, just trying to have a rational, good faith discussion.

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Your position is idealist and neither rational nor good faith - don’t expect others to meet you with merits your position lacks.

          • Dr. Jenkem
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I don’t see how acknowledging that other branches of communism and Marxism exist is idealism, bad faith, or irrational.

            • @ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              13
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Because you only advocate for ideas that dont exist in reality, and deride actually existing marxism as ‘tankie’, you can continue to advocate for idealist positions, but it requires you to build a coherent movement around it otherwise its just masterbation and contrarianism.

            • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              10
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s not what you’ve done, though, is it? If you’re unable to describe your own arguments, how can you possibly hope to engage with other people?