snixyz123 to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1120
arrow-up1120imageWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlsnixyz123 to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-squareBentiGorlichlinkfedilink2•2 years agoSadly exactly that is the reason that windows is just a bunch of spaghetti code XD
minus-squareThesePaycheckAvenginglinkfedilink2•2 years agoAnd yet, Linux tools are even older and the kernel better written than either Windows or OSX.
minus-square@StudioLE@programming.devlinkfedilink1•2 years agoDo you have a source for the second half of your statement?
minus-squarePaintedSnaillinkfedilink1•2 years agoMost of which have to be recompiled to support newer libraries when the older libraries aren’t supported anymore. There’s a reason why package managers have to deal with dependency issues.
minus-square@BlueDiamond@rammy.sitelinkfedilink1•2 years agoWhat is spaghetti code? (Sorry am non coder)
minus-squareTerabyteRexlinkfedilink1•2 years agomicrosoft has tried to move everyone to a modern framework only. when they successfully have a win32/x86 emulator runnong smoothly they will gut a lot
Sadly exactly that is the reason that windows is just a bunch of spaghetti code XD
And yet, Linux tools are even older and the kernel better written than either Windows or OSX.
Do you have a source for the second half of your statement?
Most of which have to be recompiled to support newer libraries when the older libraries aren’t supported anymore. There’s a reason why package managers have to deal with dependency issues.
Before flatpak Linux backwards compatibility was rough.
What is spaghetti code? (Sorry am non coder)
microsoft has tried to move everyone to a modern framework only. when they successfully have a win32/x86 emulator runnong smoothly they will gut a lot