@UsedChicken@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 2 years agoRuleionairei.imgur.comimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1805
arrow-up1805imageRuleionairei.imgur.com@UsedChicken@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 2 years agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareWabiSabiPapilinkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoimagine a society not dependent on individual charity (with wealth expropriated from the working class) for improving material wellbeing. does a ‘nice’ king justify monarchy?
minus-square@ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•2 years agoDoes it justify it? Not at all. Does it make it slightly less bad? Yes.
minus-square@zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years ago slightly less bad What is even the point of making that point though? Do we give him a cookie for being a “nice” exploiter?
imagine a society not dependent on individual charity (with wealth expropriated from the working class) for improving material wellbeing.
does a ‘nice’ king justify monarchy?
Does it justify it? Not at all.
Does it make it slightly less bad? Yes.
What is even the point of making that point though? Do we give him a cookie for being a “nice” exploiter?