• Alto
    link
    fedilink
    331 year ago

    I’m starting to think that maybe, just maybe brute forcing a 26 yesr old engine that makes skyrim have a stroke if you try to play above 30fps isn’t a good idea

      • @Animoscity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        No, Im not a fan of the game personally but a quick search shows they are using the creative engine 2, which is a newer version of their engine.

        • @azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          They could have called it Creative Engine 129030129784.32985 for all that it matters. It’s just a name for an engine update, as they do for every new game. They didn’t re-write it from scratch; that would be a billion-dollar venture.

          From what I’ve read it’s the exact same engine as FO4 with better lighting (and of course, as with every new game, some improvements locally relevant to the gameplay).
          But, fundamentally, underneath the fancy lights, still the same engine. That explains the 2008-esque animations, the bugs, the performance issues, and general flatness of the game. It can’t be more than “Skyrim in Space” because that’s what it technically is.

        • Alto
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Ill see if I can find it when I’m at my PC, but in an interview a dev said it was still using significant amounts of code from their Gamebryo engine from 97

        • @mordack550@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Because putting a 2 after the name makes a new engine. It’s just a new iteration of the same old engine that runs Fallout 3, skyrim, and Fallout 4.