• @uwe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    492 years ago

    I’m going to be a dad in a few weeks. 🥲 (Feel free to dunk on me with the inevitable 'why?'s, and ‘did you live under a rock?’ I can’t feel any worse anymore anyway 🤗)

    • fred-kowalski
      link
      fedilink
      612 years ago

      I chose not to have kids. You can have my carbon offset.

      Individual guilt for systemic problems plays well to the elites (ultra-wealthy). Unless you’re a billionaire. Then I want my offset back.

    • Kill_joy
      link
      fedilink
      282 years ago

      Mine is 7 months old now. I felt the same. Just wait, you’ll likely feel that it was the best thing you ever did. Your kid may be the one to drive some positive change. Just do the best you can and give yourself some grace.

        • @SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Realistically, 10 probably would spread your resources too thin, if you want each to excel enough to be part of the solution.

          3-5 though, that’s a good range.

    • @June@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      Good luck to you and yours. I sincerely hope we’re wrong about how bad we think it’s going to get in the next 50 years.

    • Bernie Ecclestoned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Human problems have human solutions.

      Renewables are already cheaper than fossil fuels, it just takes time for the economics to shake out.

      Plenty of jobs in a clean economy as well.

      • Bonehead
        link
        fedilink
        21
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        …it just takes time…

        Yeah, that’s the thing the scientists are saying we’re running out of though.

          • @YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            The effects from about 250 years of industrialization sure did compound, huh?

            So we’ll compound more and be right on track in what, 300-350 years?

                • Bernie Ecclestoned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Upgrade your reading comprehension 🤡

                  Where did the industrial revolution start?

                  It was not global from 1760 to 1820 ya jabroni

                  Renewables are being implemented in a far wider geographic than the Industrial Revolution was is my point

                  • @YeetPics@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    2
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    My point is the implications of the industrial revolution don’t stop at national borders.

                    You don’t need every country to emit pollution when they all share the same atmosphere.

                    And it’s overwhelmingly likely that the rollout of renewables and environmentally responsible infrastructure won’t happen everywhere at once. It begins in the countries with the ability and materials to produce such systems.

                    Do you have a map of existing renewable use per capital to see if my opinion is accurate or are you just going to be a massive prick?

          • @SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Dooming is like porn to these people man. They don’t care about the realities at all, and only are interested in this article because it helps them feel bad.

            Doomers just aren’t worth it.

            • Bernie Ecclestoned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 years ago

              I just got a job in agtech that mitigates climate change specifically so I didn’t have to live with existential dread

              Life’s too short to spend it worrying