Sjmarf to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1724
arrow-up1724imageSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksSjmarf to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-square@HeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink14•2 years agoThat’s funny… until I actually think about a 2.5in diameter turd… then I’m horrified.
minus-square@urinnerchild87@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 years agoI think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
minus-square@Madison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•2 years ago2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8").
minus-square@Johandea@feddit.nulinkfedilink2•2 years agoCan you please start using real units. Seriously.
minus-square@Madison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•2 years agoIt’s the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8".
minus-square@lolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoNo. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
minus-square@hydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•2 years agoRelevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
minus-square@SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink2•2 years agoI googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-square@FilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 years ago2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
minus-square@SnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilink2•2 years agoThat doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
minus-square@SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink2•2 years ago1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
minus-square@FilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 years agoI am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
That’s funny… until I actually think about a 2.5in diameter turd… then I’m horrified.
Pretty much this size
I think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8").
Can you please start using real units. Seriously.
It’s the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8".
No. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
They should just refer to the caliber
I fire 120 mm high-explosive rounds
Relevant username.
That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?