@Cwilliams@beehaw.org to Linux@lemmy.ml • edit-22 years agoAnyone have a better solution? :Pbeehaw.orgimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1339
arrow-up1339imageAnyone have a better solution? :Pbeehaw.org@Cwilliams@beehaw.org to Linux@lemmy.ml • edit-22 years agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-square@Sentientted@monero.townlinkfedilink7•2 years agoI am not the most experienced by any means, but wouldn’t it be better to run it with a “;” in the spot off all of the “&” so that way if one of the commands fail it doesn’t stop mid script?
minus-square@Sentientted@monero.townlinkfedilink4•2 years agoYeah you are right. Thanks for the correction
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍linkfedilink7•2 years agoAnd even then, don’t you want ||? You want to run the next one only if the previous one failed, right?
I am not the most experienced by any means, but wouldn’t it be better to run it with a “;” in the spot off all of the “&” so that way if one of the commands fail it doesn’t stop mid script?
deleted by creator
Yeah you are right. Thanks for the correction
And even then, don’t you want
||? You want to run the next one only if the previous one failed, right?