I get that it’s open source provided you use codium not code but I still find that interesting

    • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      801 year ago

      This one is a bigger issue. One of the projects I used to contribute to moved to Gitlab, and saw a significant decrease in organic contributors. GitHub simply has more users, better SEO, and a better ecosystem

    • @flashgnash@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      True but GitHub wasn’t always Microsoft and at least in my experience moving between git providers is a pain

          • Captain Beyond
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            GitHub allows you to select any license (including a proprietary license) or no license at all. This does not mean that GitHub encourages one to select a free software license or any license at all.

            In 2014, John Sullivan, then Executive Director of FSF, also asserted that GitHub’s choosealicense.com was anti-copyleft.

            Anti-copyleft bias noted by Stallman and Sullivan is evident from the very beginning, from the founder Tom Preston-Werner himself. In 2011, Preston-Werner wrote that one should “open source (almost) everything” under a permissive license, because the GPL is “too dogmatic,” but keep “anything that represents business value” proprietary.

      • @aleq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        How is it a pain? You just change the origin on your existing project, and new projects you just use the new one to start with.

        • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          191 year ago

          You gotta change the origin on every deployment you have. Update environment vars, reconfigure tools. You have to port all your PRs over somehow. Your issues. Your documentation. All the access keys. Etc.