Youtube let the other shoe drop in their end-stage enshittification this week. Last month, they required you to turn on Youtube History to view the feed of youtube videos recommendations. That seems reasonable, so I did it. But I delete my history every 1 week instead of every 3 months. So they don’t get much from my choices. It still did a pretty good job of showing me stuff I was interested in watching.

Then on Oct 1, they threw up a “You’re using an Ad Blocker” overlay on videos. I’d use my trusty Overlay Remover plugin to remove the annoying javascript graphic and watch what I wanted. I didn’t have to click the X to dismiss the obnoxious page.

Last week, they started placing a timer with the X so you had to wait 5 seconds for the X to appear so you could dismiss blocking graphic.

Today, there was a new graphic. It allowed you to view three videos before you had to turn off your Ad Blocker. I viewed a video 3 times just to see what happens.

Now all I see is this.

Google has out and out made it a violation of their ToS to have an ad blocker to view Youtube. Or you can pay them $$$.

I ban such sites from my systems by replacing their DNS name in my hosts file routed to 127.0.0.1 which means I can’t view the site. I have quite a few banned sites now.

  • @wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    If google cant afford youtube, they could sell it. But they easily can, so Im not losing sleep over the $2 a week they lose from me.

    Or, alternatively, if the ads were reasonable, next to no one would feel any real obligation to block them. But they arent, so why should I be concerned about the sites funding?

    Like, google isnt some poor struggling indie dev who cant make ends meet. Im not exactly overflowing with sympathy for their business decisions. Theyre the reason adblock is required for modern internet use.

    • @Ronnie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Perhaps ads become more unreasonable because so many people block them that those who do watch them are forced to pick up the slack?

      • @BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, it’s just following the curve, until their metrics show them that people stop watching they reduce the number of ads 10% until next cycle.

        They have been using the frog boiling method, and crossed my limit like two years ago, when they went from a 5 second ad each x videos to two ads for every video.

      • @teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Nah…the cable company charges you to watch commercials , cell phone providers charge you to sell your data…on and on

      • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        When businesses are required to increase profits by 30% every year to not be seen as a failure, they would increase the ads no matter how many of the users watch them.