• @wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s a Security Council resolution, very different than a broader UN operation.

    The resolution itself does not provide for military force to be used for enforcement. Canada was acting against this.

    • @ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      The enforcement was through monitoring. If someone breaks the sanction, then this aircraft would provide the evidence. It’s not military action like you suggest.

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Would you like to refresh my memory on which countries have permanent veto power on the Security Council?

      Would you also like to remind me which countries on the Security Council voted to impose sanctions on North Korea?

      I’ll wait.

        • PugJesus
          link
          fedilink
          162 years ago

          Does not grant the use of military force. That doesn’t mean that surveillance planes are banned, ffs.

          You’re really going out of your way to defend what is meaningless and petty nationalist dickwaving for domestic Chinese media.

          • @spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Nah they’re just looking for reasons to shit on Canada because you know… Trudeau bad.

            Edit: I have no basis for the above comment. It was reactionary and silly. I shall leave it up in shame.