Rivian says “fat finger” caused software update to brick infotainment systems, physical servicing may be required::Today’s cars are more like computers on wheels, and even a seemingly routine software update can lead to unexpected consequences. Rivian unfortunately experienced a “fat finger” mishap with their latest software update, bricking infotainment systems […]

  • @grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I think it’s also worth noting that “security certificates” in this context are almost certainly there for the purpose of locking the system away from modification by the vehicle owner, which means they weren’t necessary (and indeed, ought to be prohibited by law) to begin with.

    Rivian was hoist on their own consumer-hostile petard.

    • TrumpetX
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I don’t think so in this context. This is probably more like SSL cert trusting or some private/public key pair.

      • @LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Based on the fact that the screen is blank, I think @grue was correct. The certificate that tells the system that the infotainment was valid was incorrect, so the infotainment couldn’t load. They used the dev-infotainment cert instead of the prod cert.