@Deegham@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 year agomeasuring rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square279fedilinkarrow-up11.39K
arrow-up11.39Kimagemeasuring rulelemmy.blahaj.zone@Deegham@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 year agomessage-square279fedilink
minus-square@ThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoLol can’t tell, is this 85% stupid or closer to 100?
minus-square@ThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoNot nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference
minus-square@Fal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoI WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn’t mean that the scale isn’t objectively better.
minus-square@ThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoOh yea I think I do agree with you that the C scale is objectively better.
minus-square@Fal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoCope harder. F is objectively better for environment. C is objectively better for scientific calculation
minus-square@ThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-21 year agoOof you really trying to get others to die on that hill with ya huh?
Lol can’t tell, is this 85% stupid or closer to 100?
Are percentages too hard for you?
Not nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference
I WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn’t mean that the scale isn’t objectively better.
Oh yea I think I do agree with you that the C scale is objectively better.
Cope harder. F is objectively better for environment. C is objectively better for scientific calculation
Oof you really trying to get others to die on that hill with ya huh?
You’re objectively dumb