• @Coki91
    link
    English
    36 months ago

    In that case, could you please number the “Actions” they’ve done that deem them fascist? It’s been 7 days of government, im sure you’ll have no issue narrowing them down in such a timeframe. I would like details if you are able to provide, thanks!

    • cheesepotatoes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      216 months ago

      Okay sure,

      Number 1: Threatening to jail and/or shoot protestors.

      That was a fun game, thanks.

      • @Coki91
        link
        English
        36 months ago

        Thanks for the summary, unfortunately I must correct some inaccuracies on the provided bullet points

        Number 1: The threat of Jail is only for those protesters who incur on Blocking Public roads and or depriving other citizens of their right to freely transit, which has always been against the law, which makes them Criminals. The threat of Jail is only for criminals. And the claim of shooting protesters is from someone NOT in the government, in fact they are opposition so it’s not attributable to the government in any way.

        Hope this helps to make a clearer vision of what they have/are actually doing, would you please be so kind to update the list so we can see how many fascist things they are doing with that clarified?

          • @Coki91
            link
            English
            36 months ago

            Not out in the woods necessarily, but it certainly wouldnt make a horrible protest place either.

            They just have to do it like how Argentines protested against The Minister of Economy ot the Previous Government (Milei’s opponent in the presidential elections) where they manifested, called and paid by no one (unlike these “Piqueteros” the article talks about), on a Sunday and blocked no streets or pathways. Simple as that!

              • @Coki91
                link
                English
                4
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Are you… advocating violence?..

                I literally just said a peaceful manifestation without violation of the other’s right is possible and has been done not even too far back.

                And also, these “Piquetes” aren’t peaceful at all. It is violent to stop workers from going to work, threatening their income necessary to sustain their life, it’s a crime under the hood of enforcing a right and that’s why they should be repressed. Those who don’t incur on the people’s freedom to go to work and live peacefully shouldn’t be of course.

                • @Nudding@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  36 months ago

                  Was John F Kennedy advocating for violence when he said it in 1962? Or do people have a right to violent rebellion when they are opressed?

                  • @Coki91
                    link
                    English
                    26 months ago

                    It was a genuine question, Im at a Loss of what are you trying to say or imply

                    I’ll stand by my claim that a peaceful protest that doesnt violate anyone else’s rights is not only possible, but should be the norm where these “Social” Organizations have only done the contrary in Argentina thus far.

                  • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    16 months ago

                    Removed under rule 6:

                    “Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.”