F_Haxhausen to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agoYummy Mummylemmy.worldimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1719
arrow-up1719imageYummy Mummylemmy.worldF_Haxhausen to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-square@odium@programming.devlinkfedilink24•edit-21 year agodd/mm/yyyy is the second best date system
minus-square@funkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink6•1 year agoThis, the twenty-fifth day of the XIIth month, heretofore known as December, in the year of our Lord: Two Thousand and Twenty Three.
minus-squareIgnotumlinkfedilink3•1 year agoNot 1703530801, not 1703530799, we meet at exactly 1703530800!
minus-squareprolelinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 year agoI think mm/dd/yyyy is better than dd/mm/yyyy, because you can sort by the first number and the dates will be in chronological order (though I agree with the below comment that YYYY MM DD is the best).
10/1
10/2
10/3
…
I don’t get it
dd/mm/yyyy is the second best date system
What would be the best then?
YYYY MM DD
ISO 8601
Rfc3339?
This, the twenty-fifth day of the XIIth month, heretofore known as December, in the year of our Lord: Two Thousand and Twenty Three.
Unix Time
Let’s meet up, how about 1703530800 'o clock?
And not one second later!
Not 1703530801, not 1703530799, we meet at exactly 1703530800!
yyyy-MM-dd
25/DEC/2023
I think mm/dd/yyyy is better than dd/mm/yyyy, because you can sort by the first number and the dates will be in chronological order (though I agree with the below comment that YYYY MM DD is the best).
I’d give this comment a 4/10.
I judge this… 4th of October
Does look like cricket scores tbh