• @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    People are still using GRUB to dual boot? It’s not 2010 anymore. systemd-boot is the objectively superior choice.

      • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I have no desire to engage with an objectively incorrect view. However, you are the second person to mention refind which I am unfamiliar with and I’m intrigued.

        • @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          systemd-boot is GRUB but without customization and fewer supported features (LLVM root etc). What more is there to say?

          rEFInd is (as the name implies) an EFI bootloader that, on every boot, scans all attached storage devices for a bootable partition and presents all those found in a boot menu with a quite nice graphical theme

    • cally [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      does systemd-boot require a distro that runs systemd or is it just the name

          • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Loud doesn’t mean numerous. Ubuntu, Mint, Debian, Fedora, Arch, and Manjaro take up almost all of the desktop install market.

            • @0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Yeah, and it’s a big market… all 6% of it.

              My point was, systemd is not the only init system, there are others. Just because it’s used by over 90% of the Linux distros out there, doesn’t mean it’s the only one, thus offering a solution that is tied to systemd is not exactly a solution. Grub already has it figured out, why complicate things further.