• @Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        992 years ago

        Thats unfortunate. I’ll be moving instances then. Giving Meta a chance is a lot like giving a mosquito a chance to not suck your blood.

        • @bluefirex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          This behavior is why the fediverse alienate users and makes it hostile for new people to join.

          They didn’t do anything, yet. Give them the chance but start with 2 strikes on their account already. They fuck up, THEN you defederate. Innocent until proven otherwise.

          Edit: go on, downvote me. Show me your face. Show me how you’re all against growth on Lemmy and niceness to each other.

          • Pyro
            link
            fedilink
            English
            122 years ago

            Innocent until proven otherwise.

            Corporations like Meta have shown time and time again that they cannot be trusted to play nice with anyone else. Have we already forgotten about Cambridge Analytica or the plethora of other scandals they’ve been at the center of? The proof has been in plain view for a while now.

            • @bluefirex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              They don’t get more data because they’re federated. They literally the exact same amount of data as they do know just by scraping mastodon or Lemmy. They’re an even player in this market. Somehow you all keep forgetting that. If you don’t want meta do have data from activity pub, you being here already violates that ideal.

              • Pyro
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                Okay, but that doesn’t address any of the points I brought up.

                You said to give Meta a chance. The rest of us are broadly gesturing at all the shit they’ve done in the past, and how we want as little to do with that as possible.

                • @bluefirex@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  02 years ago

                  There is nothing they can do to fuck up your experience, ESPECIALLY on Lemmy though. Threads is a completely different concept from Lemmy and activity pub is well defined.

                  The only thing they could do is just not moderate threads and therefore putting spam in everyone’s feeds. That’s about it. I don’t think they’re leaving that unmoderated.

                  • Pyro
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    52 years ago

                    Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems like it would be trivially easy for Meta to make an army of bot accounts to manipulate whichever posts they want into being near the top of people’s feeds. That could be regular ads disguised as normal posts (a la Reddit-style guerilla marketing), or even more political astroturfing.

          • Ulu-Mulu-no-die
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 years ago

            Innocent until proven otherwise.

            There are many years of proof already about facebook/meta acting very maliciously, actively breaking laws and being fined for it, is that not proof enough? How many more do you need before you can say they’re not innocent at all?

          • @HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            Innocent until proven otherwise is a concept for criminal court.

            We aren’t putting someone in jail, we are looking at their past business practices and deciding not to do business with them based on their obvious habits.

          • Ben Hur Horse Race
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            If you disagree with me, we’ll then you’re just against niceness, admit you are! Admit you’re against niceness!

        • @guyman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Heck yeah. I’m glad users have the option to choose an instance that suits them.

          It’s nice to have these subtle differences between lemmy.ml and lemmy.world instead of making them both carbon copies of the same thing.

          I’ll gladly be staying on lemmy.world. Hopefully someday users will have the power to block instances themselves.

          • @sirxdaemon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Currently you can with with Lemmy Connect. Maybe with others as well, given the amount of apps coming out by the day. And I’m guessing they’ll fold the feature into Lemmy/Kbin proper sometime in the future.

            • @Dogs_cant_look_up@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              My (limited) understanding is that if you (we) block other instances locally, that won’t stop meta (or whoever) from accessing your (our) information and posts.

        • Techpriest
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          I already moved and stopped my recurring donation to them.

        • @Bocky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          I wish moving to a different instance was easier, I don’t want to put in much effort and it doesn’t appear to be super easy

          • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            I ended up just making an alt. Wasn’t too bad. Just signed up again and searched for some communities.

      • @sudo@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        502 years ago

        “until something happens”

        I suppose Metas history of actively being a bad actor working against societies best interests and enabling hate groups doesn’t qualify as ‘something’…

            • @bennysp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              This is great. Then all the people complaining that lemmy.world is “too big” can now be appeased with others leaving lemmy.world. Glad to see the community solve each other’s problems organically! :)

        • Favrion
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          How do you do that? I’m subscribed to like 50 conmunities. Would I have to start all over? That doesn’t sound like it’s worth it.

          • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            142 years ago

            Honestly it isn’t. Nothing about the Fediverse is private or inherently secure in that way. Everything is public. And you should assume that everything you publish through activity pub could eventually be looked at by anyone. If you want private or secure messaging there are non-activity pub open source secure alternate. In fact signing up for Lemmy there’s even a field to enter for one. Whether or not a server federates with meta. Meta is still going to data mine the ever-loving shit out of all of them. The point is. None of us are at Meta’s wim about being flooded with their toxic content.

            Honestly I want to see meta flooded with our content. So much anti-threads anti Meta sentiment. Actual leftists. And not just make believe right-wing liberals who’ve been conditioned to think that they are left. It would be hilarious to watch Meta try to play wack-a-mole sanitizing everything. To please their reptilian corporate overlords. And if you don’t care and just don’t want to see it. You can always block them personally. Why let them data mine in peace. I say we make them work for it.

            • @Zaktor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              82 years ago

              I’m not real sure how much the Threads Algorithm is going to pass through Mastodon content (and even less sure if it will even be able to pass through Lemmy content). I think the much more valuable aspect is you can pitch your Threads friends that they can move to the Fediverse and actually get to choose what content they see rather than which influencers paid Meta to fill up your feed.

              • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Oh they are going to fight it either way no doubt. But why make it easy on them I say. And you’re right. If we have access to their content and can provide actual linear feeds like people want with no toxic algorithms. It’s win-win for us and still mostly a loss for them. Even if we defiederate with them they’re still going to data mine we just cut ourself off from reaching those people preemptively.

            • @tj111@lemmy.fmhy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              I would add to this that its not just the fediverse, anything you put on the internet should be assumed to be public and non-deletable. Even with GDPR and everything, if the host deletes everything there could dtill be backups, archives, or some random person, corporation, or government could backup everything. Use secure services like signal for things you want to be private and just assume everything else could be public forever.

          • @curve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            There is a python script floating around that will sync your communities, etc. I’d link but don’t have it handy.

      • @guyman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        Heck yeah. That’s a very balanced and rational approach completely unfuelled by emotions.

        Can’t say the same for the top comment in this thread, lol.

        • tate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          So far on Lemmy I had never looked for the option to block a single user. You have changed that.

    • @guyman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      What do you mean?

      Why does everyone want lemmy.world to defederate from everything, lol.

      Users should have the option to block entire instances. That would nip this problem in the bud.

      • @necrxfagivs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        The problem with Meta is that they will harm the Fediverse.

        I found this article interesting, written by a dev who worked with google during the XMPP EEE and was originally a XMPP dev, thinking that a big company could only mean more success for the FOSS alternative. He was wrong.

        • @MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          It’s almost like some people crave enshitification.

          “Hey this decentralized stuff is really cool, let’s connect with the most gigantic corporate assholes who would absolutely centralize all of it if they could…you know, so we can grow! What could go wrong?”

          LIke…what?

      • @dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Yeah I really hope they come out with the user’s ability to block instances soon. Would be a great feature addition. There are a couple of instances that I take no issue with and don’t want others to be blocked access too, but I really just don’t want to see them in my feed.

    • @Phegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I want to be on an instance that defederates, I will move if world does not do it.

    • ßrando
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Is there any reason that they wouldn’t?