• BolexForSoup
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    the film studios claim that six Redditors’ IP address logs are “clearly relevant and proportional to the needs of the case" because the Reddit users all made comments that either establish “that Frontier has not reasonably implemented a policy for terminating repeat infringers sufficient for a safe harbor affirmative” or that “the ability to freely pirate without consequence was a draw to becoming a subscriber of Frontier."

    Last year, a Reddit user wrote that they received 44 emails from Frontier threatening to cut off their service due to torrent downloads, but “if they didn’t do it after 44 emails … they won’t."

    In 2022, another Reddit user said that they had used Frontier DSL for years and “despite the shitty internet, they didn’t give a shit what I downloaded.”

    A different Reddit user reported that Frontier confirmed to them that it had failed to send DMCA notices to the customers’ email. That Reddit user said Frontier was terminating their account. Another Redditor cited claimed that they had used two different places to find torrents and received DMCA notices from Frontier despite the user claiming that they had “been torrenting unprotected for like a decade” on Frontier “and never [got] one" before.

    Another user admitted on the FrontierFios subreddit in 2021 that they “torrent every once in a while."

    The users are immaterial. They are going upstream. They are establishing a pattern of behavior by frontier as evidenced by the comments.

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      710 months ago

      The only relevant part is the fact that it’s impossible for the discussion to entitle them to information. That’s the ruling that’s the core point of the article and it prevents any other meaningful potential precedents from being set, because the case can’t get to ruling on them.