NigahigaYT to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agoi hate my wife and i love bug litelemmy.worldimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1606
arrow-up1606imagei hate my wife and i love bug litelemmy.worldNigahigaYT to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-square@iAvicenna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•1 year agoI would say the opposite, it makes more sense to me to apply fallacies to arguments where as to apply it to a debate you probably have to isolate its main arguments and then apply it to those arguments individually
minus-square@Zozano@lemy.lollinkfedilink4•1 year agoFurthermore, debates are not governed by logic. A debate in of itself is a fallacy, in the sense that it is merely a popularity contest. If you can bullshit hard enough, or make the crowd laugh at your jokes about the person you’re debating, you’ve won.
I would say the opposite, it makes more sense to me to apply fallacies to arguments where as to apply it to a debate you probably have to isolate its main arguments and then apply it to those arguments individually
Furthermore, debates are not governed by logic. A debate in of itself is a fallacy, in the sense that it is merely a popularity contest.
If you can bullshit hard enough, or make the crowd laugh at your jokes about the person you’re debating, you’ve won.