• WardPearce
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    Yea agree, not a fan of “Meta”. But I think limiting who can use federated networks kinda goes against the federated nature of such networks. What’s next, we’ll have a centralized blacklist of lemmy instances.

    • Kes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      The nice part about federated networks is that if you disagree, you can just move instances. Nobody is bound to the will of the admins like with traditional centralized social media

    • @S_204@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      The problem is when bad actors enter the situation. Meta has no interest in being a part of the community, they want to take it over and commercialize it.

      • @notavote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        And by commercializing it they would destroy it, since they will be promoting content that generates most clicks and everything will become agresive.

      • @woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        The problem is when bad actors enter the situation.

        Let people decide on their own what they want to see.

        • @S_204@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          That’s beyond ignorant. There’s no place for that bigoted bullshit and if you want to be around it feel free to head on over to twitter.

          • @woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            There’s no place for that bigoted bullshit and if you want to be around it feel free to head on over to twitter.

            bigot. One who is strongly partial to one’s own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

            Describes you more than me. I’m in favor of openness and individual responsibility.

      • @profz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        This is mentioned in pretty much every thread but I haven’t seen anyone apply the theory to the fediverse. The second step is for threads to create features that lure people over from Lemmy (or activitypub). So are the people saying eee by extension saying they’ll move to threads from their current server because threads have a bigger and better development team?

        • @grissee@lemmy.my.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          they’ll move to threads because threads will be incompatible with the rest of fediverse (thread essentially defederate themself), and if most content is being posted in threads, they’ll move there (since they can’t access it from other instance)

          this has happened before, such as

          • MSN messenger breaking compatibility with AOL IM (MSN wins since it got 95% market share)
          • MS Office doing obfuscation to their office file data to prevent FOSS editor like LibreOffice from rendering it correctly
        • @Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I’ve been saying exactly this since the news dropped. I fully understand people being worried, but I haven’t seen a concrete pathway to damage that doesn’t involve meta-hating users moving over to a meta product.