• Dr. Wesker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Seriously, though. It takes less brain processing power and just about the same speech-time to just say the dang time.

    • @humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If your brain works in digital time, this is true.

      Us olds have to translate the other direction.

      It’s like hearing someone say “why doesn’t everyone just speak English? Why go through the extra effort of speaking Spanish?” because you assume everyone’s internal monologue is in English.

      • @irish_link@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1410 months ago

        What do you mean if your brain works in digital time. This doesn’t translate for me and I grew up with regular clocks and wrist watches. All time is the same. A clock with both hands facing 12 is and always has been twelve o’clock. Clock face or digital clock. They give the same time. Comparing two devices that give the same information in different ways to language is absurd.

        Your comparison could work if the subject being discussed was 12 vs 24 hour time keeping. Then there is a translation between the two.

        • @Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          1810 months ago

          Analog clocks lend themselves better to thinking in fractions of an hour or day, like this post is talking about, as an hour and a half day are both represented as a circle

          Digital clocks lend themselves better to thinking in terms of number of minutes and hours directly. When working numerically, fractions of 60 are generally less intuitive, and fractions of 12 often so as well. Most people who don’t work with angles often think of fractions in terms of percent, or powers of two.

          “Quarter past” kind of tweaks the brain wrong when a quarter is intuitively 25.

            • Bob
              link
              fedilink
              1010 months ago

              They chose 12 precisely because it’s easy to divide!

            • Thistledown
              link
              fedilink
              English
              510 months ago

              I wish our numeric system was base 12 instead of base 10!

            • @Revan343@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              310 months ago

              You’re on Lemmy, of course you like fractions of 12. It is a very convenient base, having so many factors, but most people don’t think like that

              • key
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                That might be the most obscure stereotype I’ve ever read. 😆

          • @AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            It’s also precision. I think this is the biggest thing we’ve lost is some expression of precision.

            • 11:45 from a digital clock is very precise. You expect something at exactly that time, and get more impatient with vagaries of traffic or delays or clocks that aren’t synched, or just that people aren’t digital
            • “quarter of” implies less precision. If I have to wait five minutes, you’re still not late. Regular human activity in the real world is not exact so allowing for inaccuracy is both less stressful and more practical
        • @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          oh i think this may be a cultural thing, here in europe when we say “digital time” we specifically mean 24-hour time because “AM/PM” isn’t used here.

          It’s the difference between saying “dinner’s at seven” and “lunch ends at 13:30”

          • @irish_link@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            310 months ago

            Ahhh!!! That totally makes sense. I took the comment to be about digital clocks specifically vs analog clocks. Not about the type of time keeping. Then the translation analogy totally makes sense and works! Gotta love learning new things from people. Thanks Swedneck!

      • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        When people report the time they aren’t reporting their internal dialogue they’re reading what it says on the display. What it says on the display is “four twenty three” not “halfway between quarter and half past four”.

        • @humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          OP didn’t say anything about reading time off a digital clock.

          What about the opposite scenario of reporting the time you read off an analog clock? Would you translate to digital first?

          In your specific scenario, sure, it would require extra work to convert it, so I’d just read it as is.

          But when making plans, and especially spans between two different times, my brain thinks of time as portions of a pie chart, and I’d have to translate 3/4 to 45 minutes.

    • warm
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think there’s bigger problems if you have to process the time. If you’ve never heard it in your life, maybe you’d stop and think, but it’s honestly just something you learn and know, no thinking required.

      It’s like when people don’t know 24 hour time, when it’s something you’ve just grown up with, there’s no thinking and then you are confused when you hear people have to think about it or “calculate”.

      • Dr. Wesker
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1510 months ago

        24 hr time should be the global standard too, IMO. Reduce all possibilities of confusion, I say.

        • warm
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          To be honest, it’s mainly just USA that just use 12-hour (and call 24-hour “military time”?), the large majority of the world use both interchangeably.

          • @toynbee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1110 months ago

            Maybe I’m missing the joke, but I’m pretty sure 00:XX is correct.

            Please do not judge me too harshly if I’m wooshing.

      • rockerface 🇺🇦
        link
        fedilink
        710 months ago

        I have a friend that had issues telling time with analogue clocks when we studied together in a university. It really is just the matter of what you grew up with.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        I’ve been using 24 hour time for the past few years and I still have trouble with it from time to time and have to calculate it in my head.

        Also, a different example of something similar is how old I am. Despite knowing my birth year, I still struggle recalling how old I am I still have to take a moment to calculate it.