In recent days, the discussion around Lemmy has become a bit...spicy. There's a few points of impact here. To list some examples: Beehaw being frustrated enough to ponder leaving the software Sublinks being started out of uncertainty with the lemmy roadmap Drama about inability to delete images and lemmy dev reactions to the priority request [...]
  • @sunaurus@lemm.eeEnglish
    9•9 months ago

    I am very sad about the situation with Beehaw specifically.

    I think it’s a very unfortunate case where all parties have the best intentions of building something great with Lemmy, but through different circumstances, relations have soured and involved people no longer think they have a shared vision (which in my opinion is actually not true - I believe that Beehaws vision fits in very well with the direction Lemmy is going, especially with private communities being planned soon).

    I am still hopeful that things can be improved, but we will see.

    • RentlarEnglish
      3•9 months ago

      I’m not sure why Beehaw is coming up specifically in recent day (did something happen that I missed? E: Yes, a new write up from the Beehaw team, see Blaze’s reply), but their moderation issues and needs came up as early as June and July of last year, but was definitely being talked about by September between Beehaw admins and users. Here’s the thread I remember on it.

      Another thread on one of the major CSAM content attack events against Lemmy (the one that took out vlemmy.net as you probably will recall) highlighted their desire for a better platform.

      I’m OOTL if anything specific happened between the Lemmy devs and Beehaw admins this week that caused more beef, but the mindset that the development of much needed moderation features was progressing too slowly was with the Beehaw admins for many months now.

        • RentlarEnglish
          3•9 months ago

          Thank you for the link! I can see yeah it appears like drama on the face of it, but from what I see it’s nutomic continuing to be defensive (as far as I’m concerned it’s their right to be) and the write up is a mere extension of genuine uneasiness expressed last fall, it all just adds up to mean that Beehaw and Lemmy’s goals still haven’t fully aligned in the last 6 months.

          I’ve donated to the Beehaw project because I support their vision, if they separate entirely from Lemmy on a new service I’ll be happy for them for it, but I will stay on Lemmy.

          • @BlazeEnglish
            2•9 months ago

            Thank you for the link!

            You are welcome!

            it all just adds up to mean that Beehaw and Lemmy’s goals still haven’t fully aligned in the last 6 months.

            Yes indeed

    • @BlazeEnglish
      2•9 months ago

      (which in my opinion is actually not true - I believe that Beehaws vision fits in very well with the direction Lemmy is going, especially with private communities being planned soon).

      Strong agree.

      Hopefully there can be some renewed collaboration in the future.