• DdCno1
    link
    fedilink
    219 months ago

    Sounds like a Sony Trinitron to me. I had a 17" one for about a decade and it was equally magnificent and heavy. The largest one was 24" 16:10 widescreen.

    https://aperturegrille.fandom.com/wiki/SONY_GDM-FW900

    I wanted one so badly, but while these were finally somewhat affordable in 2010 (and still vastly superior to any flat-screen monitor), the shipping costs would have been ruinous.

    • @survivalmachine@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      God, I hated Trinitrons. We had them at work and while they had noticeably sharper images, my brain never could filter out the two horizontal wires that stabilized the grill.

    • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      … But as soon as someone showed you The Line, you could no longer NOT see it, which meant you had to sell it.

    • ares35
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      i would still want one of those monitors, but the few i’ve seen are ridiculously priced.

    • BruceTwarzen
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      So in what way were they better? Back in the day, even he didn’t know, the only answer i got from him was that tge screen was flat. I didn’t really bother anymore because that was also the year people started showing up with flatscreens.

      • @survivalmachine@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Sharper and brighter images for a while. The aperture grille design allowed more light through than the shadow masks for a while until shadow mask manufacturing quality caught up in the late '80s. The flat screen offered a simpler geometry that allowed for sharper images until the old school CRT manufacturing caught up in the mid '90s. By the early '00s, there were really no advantages and they were riding on name recognition as a superior brand until the late 00’s when LCDs finally overcame their size and price hurdles.