Both President Biden and the White House have enabled the Fediverse integration on Threads.

  • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That’s a bad implementation then. Modern open-source XMPP works great on mobile

    The issue was the state of mobile clients when XMPP died in the mainstream and state of the art was crap like Xabber. Conversations was better but too little, too late.

    iOS is more of a mixed bag, but that is solely Apple’s fault and applies to all messengers other than iMessage.

    Telegram works flawlessly pretty much everywhere, including iOS which my mom uses.

    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      Well, Monal on iOS doesn’t work worse than Telegram on iOS, so then apparently it’s flawless as well. I am not an iOS user, but I heard complaints about Telegram on iOS as well regarding notifications.

      • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        Well, Monal on iOS doesn’t work worse than Telegram on iOS, so then apparently it’s flawless as well.

        Again: The current state is irrelevant when discussing the time frame when Google allegedly killed it. The state of Jabber and its clients was just abhorrently bad back in the day. That was the reason the world moved to WhatsApp. Google Talk has always been a niche product. That’s why it’s dead.

        • poVoq
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          It’s not dead, and works fine. I am not disagreeing that it had a serious set-back but that’s water down the river.

          Also WhatsApp is using a slightly modified version of XMPP, so your argument is a bit funny :)

          • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            It’s not dead, and works fine.

            Also WhatsApp is using a slightly modified version of XMPP

            Obviously modified enough to work better with mobile when it launched than Jabber’s state of the art back then.

            Again: Google did not kill Jabber. Jabber achieved its downfall on its own by being bettered by proprietary services that just worked better on mobile devices BACK THEN.

            • poVoq
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              Google Talk was never Jabber. The Google Jabber integration was way before that in Gmail. Google Talk was what came after Google decided to abandon Jabber.

              And yes Google very much held Jabber back by having the largest user-base in their Gmail integration and refusing to even implement SSL for that let alone supporting any other innovations like better mobile support. If Google had actually supported Jabber instead of sabotaging it, we would not have this discussion.

              • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Google Talk was never Jabber. The Google Jabber integration was way before that in Gmail. Google Talk was what came after Google decided to abandon Jabber.

                Wikipedia says otherwise.

                If Google had actually supported Jabber instead of sabotaging it, we would not have this discussion.

                Google kills messaging services all the time and launches new, incompatible ones. Google did not sabotage Jabber, they sabotage their own chat services all the time.

                • poVoq
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  Wikipedia is not a good source on this. By the time Google’s XMPP based messaging product was renamed “Google Talk” it had long ceased to be compatible with the wider Jabber federation.

                  While I agree that Google does also sabotage their own messengers, it was deeply involved in XMPP specs development and other stuff around the ecosystem in the beginning, and then just quietly began to blockage urgently needed changes as they were unwilling to implement them in their system.

                  But I guess this discussion has reached the end of being useful as you clearly have a lack of understanding what actually happened back then.