• deweydecibel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1041 year ago

      It is shocking because they did it after the investigation had started, which is monumentally stupid.

      You can destroy any records you want at any time, unless there’s an investigation underway or you have good reason to believe one will be starting. At that point, you’re destroying evidence.

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The crazy part is the implication that the evidence destroyed was probably more damning than having a judge and jury assume anything reasonably suggested to have been implicated by those chats as true.

        • @eronth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          261 year ago

          I wager they’re so used to getting away with shit that destroying evidence probably says less about the crimes committed and more about the piss-poor justice system.

          • enkers
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            *sigh* After reading some of the other comments, I have to agree. I’m not sure whether to be relieved or even more discouraged. It’s a dreadfully boring dystopia.

      • nelson
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Must be the evidence was more damning than the SCT of destroying evidence