Karna to Technology@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoFull scan of 1 cubic millimeter of brain tissue took 1.4 petabytes of data, equivalent to 14,000 4K movies — Google's AI experts assist researcherswww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1343cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.today
arrow-up1343external-linkFull scan of 1 cubic millimeter of brain tissue took 1.4 petabytes of data, equivalent to 14,000 4K movies — Google's AI experts assist researcherswww.tomshardware.comKarna to Technology@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square49fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.today
minus-square@Aopen@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink6•1 year agoCERN datacenter has 1600 times less capacity https://home.cern/news/news/computing/exabyte-disk-storage-cern Although global storage capacity will be 125 times higher by 2025 than whole scan would occupy https://cybersecurityventures.com/the-world-will-store-200-zettabytes-of-data-by-2025/
minus-square@utopiah@lemmy.mllinkfedilink2•1 year agoI’d be curious about the access speed comparison, because I’d assume for the brain it’s be RAM equivalent, not SDD
minus-squareTheRealKunilinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoJust gotta lower the clock speed enough for us not to notice. As long as we don’t interact with the outside world, just other stored human brains, it can be slow as molasses and we won’t notice.
CERN datacenter has 1600 times less capacity
https://home.cern/news/news/computing/exabyte-disk-storage-cern
Although global storage capacity will be 125 times higher by 2025 than whole scan would occupy
https://cybersecurityventures.com/the-world-will-store-200-zettabytes-of-data-by-2025/
I’d be curious about the access speed comparison, because I’d assume for the brain it’s be RAM equivalent, not SDD
deleted by creator
Just gotta lower the clock speed enough for us not to notice. As long as we don’t interact with the outside world, just other stored human brains, it can be slow as molasses and we won’t notice.