It’s probably nothing sinister, though.
  • @Classy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    8•5 months ago

    Not true, it specifically states in the article that, for example, one user had over 300 photos reappear, “some of which were revealing”. This is obviously not great but it isn’t likely as scandalous as it’s being made out to be.

      • @azalty@jlai.luEnglish
        7•5 months ago

        It was kinda wrote like a statement. People who didn’t read the article will read it as such, misinforming people

          • @Classy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            5•5 months ago

            There’s so much misinformation online, sure it could have been a joke but it’s so easy to just be lazy, read the comment straight and move on acting like there’s some kind of operation going on at Apple stealing your nudes. I don’t really care if it’s a joke or not, and you’re not even the OP so who are you to say it’s for a fact a joke?

              • @DarkenfolkEnglish
                2•5 months ago

                What article, it’s just a link. If I can’t read it here it ain’t there.

                We shouldn’t encourage post-bot behaviour in the posters, title+summary or gtfo.

                  • @DarkenfolkEnglish
                    2•5 months ago

                    Nah, I just really hate people link dumping. Why even bother posting if you can’t be bothered to post something with content?

        • @Glytch@lemmy.worldEnglish
          6•4 months ago

          Since we’re being pedantic: the word you’re looking for is “written” not “wrote”.

          • @azalty@jlai.luEnglish
            3•4 months ago

            I don’t see where I’ve mentioned a small English mistake. I said that it was written like a statement, which could misinform people