• @Classy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Not true, it specifically states in the article that, for example, one user had over 300 photos reappear, “some of which were revealing”. This is obviously not great but it isn’t likely as scandalous as it’s being made out to be.

      • @azalty@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It was kinda wrote like a statement. People who didn’t read the article will read it as such, misinforming people

          • @Classy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            There’s so much misinformation online, sure it could have been a joke but it’s so easy to just be lazy, read the comment straight and move on acting like there’s some kind of operation going on at Apple stealing your nudes. I don’t really care if it’s a joke or not, and you’re not even the OP so who are you to say it’s for a fact a joke?

              • @Darkenfolk
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                What article, it’s just a link. If I can’t read it here it ain’t there.

                We shouldn’t encourage post-bot behaviour in the posters, title+summary or gtfo.

                  • @Darkenfolk
                    link
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    Nah, I just really hate people link dumping. Why even bother posting if you can’t be bothered to post something with content?

        • @Glytch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Since we’re being pedantic: the word you’re looking for is “written” not “wrote”.

          • @azalty@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I don’t see where I’ve mentioned a small English mistake. I said that it was written like a statement, which could misinform people