• Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Of course there’s a difference. An invasion is about seizing territory.

    • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      An attack is a casus belli even without seizing territory.

      For example, if Putin launched missiles at Warsaw or DC, he would start a war. It makes no difference if any territory is taken.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I see, and that will justify killing countless Russian children in your opinion?

        • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A missile strike is a legitimate casus belli. If you’re not a pacifist, that means it justifies force to achieve a military objective, which necessarily justifies killing civilians.

          Whether that’s “countless” or a few depends on the objective.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Yes, I get that you think that as long as it fits the military goal, killing any amount of children is justified.

            And I’m telling you that position is disgusting and abhorrent.

            • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There is no military goal that justifies killing “any amount” of civilians. All of them have limits, which are based on military capabilities.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Okay, what is the limit of children the IDF should be able to kill before it is no longer justified? Give me a number.

                • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  In general, civilian-combatant casualty ratios range from 1:1 to 5:1. They tend to be higher in urban settings like Gaza. The Chechen wars were closer to 7-10:1

                  The US estimates 15,000 combatants have been killed in Gaza. If so, we would consider 15,000 to 75,000 civilian deaths to be normal at this point.

                  • livus
                    link
                    fedilink
                    3
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Anyone reading along in this thread should probably check the veracity of these claimed ratios. Wikipedia has an okay overview.

                    It’s also worth noting that the Russian wars in Chechnya were particularly notable for their brutal war crimes.

                    @FlyingSquid

                  • Natanael
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    Israel themselves said they would accept 15 dead civilians for low level Hamas staff and 100+ for higher ranking ones.

                    And they overshoot hard.

                    IDF count every male above 16 as Hamas by default. You’re gonna get a lot of false positives that way