• @Unskilled5117@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Again you ignore words like “often”. There certainly are projects that are doing extremely well, and I am happy for them, i am one of those donating.

      Yet you ignore the funding problem that exists in open source. You can’t make it go away by naming a few that have done well for themselves. Even those that are doing well enough, what could they achieve, if they had comparable funding to bigger players that are advertising? I am not saying that it’s the option that everybody should go for, but if one chooses to, i would like it to be privacy respecting, and thats where hopefully mozilla will come in. And outside of opensource, on a “normal” persons phone, how many apps are funded via ads? Wouldn’t it be great if those were privacy preserving instead? It’s a step in the right direction.

      I will stop replying to you, as you don’t seem mature enough to hold a respectful discussion, without trying to frame my opinions as trying to be manipulative.

    • KaynA
      link
      36 months ago

      We can cherry-pick projects too.

      Lemmy barely gets enough donations to fund a single developer.

      core-js, one of the largest JavaScript libraries, was cussed out for even having the audacity to ask for donations.

      Donations aren’t the steady source of income you seem to be thinking they are.