@lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • edit-211 months agoIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square183fedilinkarrow-up1379file-text
arrow-up1379imageIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.org@lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • edit-211 months agomessage-square183fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglish9•11 months agoSQL uses it but yeah, not programming language :p. I was on mobile so I didn’t have a .XCompose available to type ≠.
minus-square@lemming@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink5•11 months agoIf you want to be able to write practically anything on mobile, including ≠, ≈, ‰, ℝ etc., have a look at Unexpected keyboard. No spellcheck or autocomplete, though.
minus-square@lud@lemm.eelinkfedilink3•11 months ago I was on mobile so I didn’t have a .XCompose available to type. I feel the opposite. On mobile I have much easier access to special characters. I just need to hold down characters to get more variants.
minus-square@KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink2•11 months agoYup, ≠ is right “under” =. As is ≈.
minus-square@dan@upvote.aulinkfedilink2•11 months agoSQL is definitely a programming language. Most dialects are Turing-complete in some way. Some allow custom functions and stored procedures.
SQL uses it but yeah, not programming language :p.
I was on mobile so I didn’t have a
.XComposeavailable to type≠.If you want to be able to write practically anything on mobile, including ≠, ≈, ‰, ℝ etc., have a look at Unexpected keyboard. No spellcheck or autocomplete, though.
I feel the opposite. On mobile I have much easier access to special characters. I just need to hold down characters to get more variants.
Yup, ≠ is right “under” =. As is ≈.
SQL is definitely a programming language. Most dialects are Turing-complete in some way. Some allow custom functions and stored procedures.