• @HipsterTenZero
    link
    73 months ago

    Going with D&D’s version of necromancy… probably not. Undead have a strong and innate anti-life bias. Some intelligent undead are likely to be able to mask it, but without exceptionally strong wills will likely still act in a way that will cause the most death.

    Non-undead ressurected individuals would likely be able to testify, however.

    • @Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      So you’re saying we should use the undead to replace the police? I mean sure they might more people, but at least they won’t be discriminatory about it.

      • @HipsterTenZero
        link
        23 months ago

        Hey, so long as someone with more ethics than the average patrol officer is in charge of the Command Undead spell, skeleton cops might even be safer and more humane for everyone…

    • @cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      How about the magic spell that gives you ability to ask the dead 5 questions and they must answer it truthfully?

      (I saw it in the D&D movie, never actually played the game, I don’t have any friends)

      • @HipsterTenZero
        link
        13 months ago

        You know, come to think of it, I did play in a game where this exact scenario played out, we got some state-sanctioned necromancers to get an actual corpse as a witness to a crime with that exact spell.

    • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I know it isn’t canon, but in several games we shoved most of the healing and harming clerical magic into Necromancy, since that is the school that deals with life magic.

      Resurrected or raised dead should be living, and therefore able to testify. Possibly even a lich or vampire, but I would agree that a revanent, mummy, zombie, weight, skeleton, or ghost would be inadmissible.