@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 6 months agoCheekymander.xyzimagemessage-square223fedilinkarrow-up11.24K
arrow-up11.24KimageCheekymander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square223fedilink
minus-square@webghost0101@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish8•6 months agoMy teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia. I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.
minus-squareladlinkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months agoI think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything
minus-square@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoand they’re correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites
My teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia.
I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia
It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.
I think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything
and they’re correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites