Fans customized the Wicked movie poster to more closely match the original Broadway poster.

Original Broadway Poster:

Movie poster:

Some fans, disappointed by the poster, altered it to be closer to the original, moving Grande’s hand and lowering the brim of Erivo’s hat to cover her eyes. The edits prompted Erivo to respond. “This is the wildest, most offensive thing I have seen

“None of this is funny. None of it is cute. It degrades me. It degrades us,” Erivo continued. “The original poster is an ILLUSTRATION. I am a real life human being, who chose to look right down the barrel of the camera to you, the viewer… because, without words we communicate with our eyes.”

So, this seems like a completely reasonable reaction to fans making fan content.

  • @scbasteve7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1311 month ago

    If it was her decision that her full face should be on display, the backlash should be evidence enough that someone else gets paid to make those decisions, not her.

    The original looks boring. She has absolutely no emotions on her face. There’s no mystique, no ‘wickedness’. Even the composition looks like something a high schooler in Photoshop class would make.

    The edit isn’t perfect either. But at least it pays homage to the original in more than just image. It adds that mystique back, and makes her look more menacing.

    What it truly boils down to is ego. Although the edit is better, and so many people agree on it, it doesn’t show her full face. And she can’t let that go.

    • ScrubblesOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      571 month ago

      Guaranteed this whole thing came up before that it didn’t match the style. She showed her cards and now makes it sound like she was the one who pushed against matching the original. Now that the fans see it and dislike it (probably like they warned that fans would), she’s mad about it. It really sounds like she pushed for this design so it wouldn’t hide her face and now she’s furious that fans reacted in the exact way that was predicted.

    • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      The edit looks ridiculous, how is it better?

      I’m not mixing this up right?

      The first picture with the red lipstick is the fan made photo?

      where you can’t see half her face?

      that is fucking weird.

      The original looks so much better.

      what are you talking about there’s no emotions on her face?

      in the fan edit they took away half her face!

      this is crazy that people like the fan edit, It’s like if you cut an origami crane in half, drew a smiley face on it with a Sharpie and you were like “yeah that’s better.”

      • @vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        371 month ago

        The original’s smile communicates much more stuff than the eyes on the face that looks like it’s completely bored.

        Trying to “communicate with her eyes” is exactly what makes the poster bad.

        • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          i disagree, but your interpretation of her eyes is your own and completely beside the point, in any case.

          • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            281 month ago

            It’s not besides the point. It’s in fact the whole point. That’s why there is a fan edit and a response and a backlash to the backlash.

            All of this is the point here. You can’t handwave away the other side cause you don’t agree or want to handle that argument.

            Her eyes look bored and like she’s trying to look serious. Like she’s worried you realized you can smell her last fart.

            • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              “All of this is the point here.”

              no, unless you are responding to somebody else, you are barking up a tree in a completely separate field.

              “You can’t handwave away the other side cause you don’t agree or want to handle that argument.”

              I’ve swatted every insult and argument here so far without breaking a sweat because they have no standing or, like your comments, are completely irrelevant to my comments, what you might want to try reading before responding to.

              what you think of her expression is completely immaterial and irrelevant to any of my comments.

              maybe you think you’re responding to somebody else?

              you can think anything you like about her expression. whatever you like; it sounds like you like farts, so you’re thinking about farts.

              That’s fine, and is completely irrelevant with respect to invalidating her own feelings of erasure.

              that is what I have been addressing, and what most of you have completely whiffed on or shamefully been attacking her for.

              I don’t care how people see the poster, I care that people are not respecting her feelings at being erased from her own artwork.

              it doesn’t matter what you think of the artwork in the slightest.

              it matters that you’re disrespecting someone for expressing themselves, bullying someone because they are being sincere.

              you’re dehumanizing them because what they say makes you uncomfortable.

              • @5in1k@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                181 month ago

                Her own artwork…. Movies are collaborations. She it a tiny but important part of the artwork not the entirety. Shit she’s like the sixth person playing the role. She created not much.

                • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  “She it a tiny but important part of the artwork…”

                  yes. and look how furious and contemptuous it has still made you that she has an opinion about her own work.

                  you claim she’s so unimportant, so why is it that she deserves so much contempt and abuse from a dozen strangers in one post simply for expressing her opinion, without demanding change or attacking anyone.

                  • @5in1k@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    211 month ago

                    No, I’m contemptuous of you. She’s foolish for feeling that way and you’re foolish for acting like she’s a victim. She’s the subject of fan art, boo fucking hoo. Not even rule34 fanart. Get off yourself.

                • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  what do you need help with understanding here?

                  you need an example of someone that made “bad” art, you mean?

            • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              ooh good question.

              she has a very deliberate stare and a relaxed face, so it looks like she’s hearing something she doesn’t like that concerns her and she’s deciding what to do about it.

              I also see something vulnerable in there, since the muscles around her eyes aren’t very tense, but still a very earnest look.

              hoping for understanding, with a little resignation to do what must be done.

              she’s nailing it with respect to her role, now that you bring it up.

      • ScrubblesOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 month ago

        That was never the point. I’m not commenting on if it’s better or not. Her reaction to something a fan made is what we’re all talking about.