I’m building a new controller “10ft” gaming PC for my living room. The CPU is a Ryzen 5 3600X and the motherboard is Asus ROG Strix X570-I. I have never done a Linux-based gaming PC before and I want everything to “just work” as best as possible.

I assume this means go with Bazzite and an AMD gpu? Anything else I need to be aware of? As I said the goal after configuring is for it to be entirely controller-controlled (8bitdo ultimate and DS4).

  • Lemongrab
    27•1 month ago

    AMD is easier to use with Linux. Get a rx6700xt or greater.

      • @DrathroEnglish
        8•1 month ago

        If you’re doing 1080p the 6600 is pretty solid. Or 7600, really. It CAN do higher resolutions, but then you’d need to start doing FSR scaling or drop settings to keep things smooth/consistent.

      • @zhenbo_endle@lemmy.caEnglish
        5•1 month ago

        I had a quick view at this post : https://www.reddit.com/r/radeon/comments/157qa6c/rx_6600_or_rx_6700_xt_for_1080p/

        It seems to me that 6700xt is much stronger than 6600. More expensive, too. Personally, I would pay some extra money 6700xt, but it depends on OP’s budget and game preference.

        I’d suggest OP to consider several factors:

        1. Is the game you’re playing CPU-intensive? aka Will your 3600X be the bottleneck if you have a powerful GPU?
        2. Do you have a 4K/1440p monitor?
        • @KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol
          2•30 days ago

          I have a 1080p monitor and I’m planning on mostly playing things like minetest morrowind, jrpg’s and such. I might also try to learn blender

      • @SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca
        2•1 month ago

        Depends on the games you like. It won’t perform well at 4k, or with newer FPS titles. Most games should be playable at low-medium quality settings.

    • JediwanOP
      2•1 month ago

      Thanks! How is AMD with ray tracing? I play a lot of survival horror and want to experience that spooky lighting

      • @Robin@lemmy.worldEnglish
        14•1 month ago

        HardwareUnboxed did a with/without ray tracing comparison. TL;DR in most games it’s not worth the performance hit. Don’t bother with ray tracing for now, especially on low or mid-range hardware. https://youtu.be/DBNH0NyN8K8

        • JediwanOP
          2•1 month ago

          That’s good to know actually. Is Nvidia so poor with Linux that it wouldn’t be worth it assuming all else being equal?

          • @Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            9•1 month ago

            The NVIDIA drivers are a constant source of problems compared to AMD. I’ve had updates completely break some games, so that if I want to play my whole library of games I have to alternate between driver versions.

          • Lemongrab
            6•1 month ago

            I haven’t had great success, it causes more problems than it is worth if you aren’t willing and knowledgeable to troubleshoot any finicky behavior. The nvidia drivers just end up causing a headache. I would never recommend anyone buy an nvidia GPU if they dont have a specific requirement like run local AI/LLMs using CUDA or raytracing (I guess). AMD can also run local LLMs using ROCm, just not supported for 5000 series or lower.

            The only Linux distro I (and my friends) have had any success with nvidia GPUs is Bazzite/Aurora. Bazzite is gaming focused and has special nvidia OS images.

      • @DrathroEnglish
        9•1 month ago

        AMD with ray tracing isn’t great. Not as bad as it used to be, but pretty lackluster overall compared to Nvidia (and to a lesser extent Intel’s GPU offerings). Linux ray tracing via Proton is also not as optimized at present, so that can take something “passable” in windows and make it unplayable on an AMD card in Linux. If you get something overkill for the resolution you’re playing at that can somewhat make up the difference.

      • .:\dGh/:.
        3•1 month ago

        Like shit. If you have the money for an RTX, go get one, even if that means gaming on Windows.