@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 5 months agobiteymander.xyzimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1469
arrow-up1469imagebiteymander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 5 months agomessage-square71fedilink
minus-square@dylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish7•5 months agoHow is this calculated? Presumably you could directly measure all but the T-Rex and pliosaur, but how are those bits forces calculated?
minus-square@MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish18•5 months agoI’m no BiteForceologist but I was assume they compare muscle size, muscle attachment points, and mechanical advantage of extant creatures and then apply that data to fossils. So not 100% accurate, but not just guessing randomly.
minus-square@phdepressed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish4•5 months agoFor the extant creatures you give them something they want to bite on and stick a measurement thing inside of that. For extinct creatures see other comment. You compare anatomy and do math.
minus-square@whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•5 months agoSoooo it’s not the number of this guy they can eat?
How is this calculated? Presumably you could directly measure all but the T-Rex and pliosaur, but how are those bits forces calculated?
I’m no BiteForceologist but I was assume they compare muscle size, muscle attachment points, and mechanical advantage of extant creatures and then apply that data to fossils. So not 100% accurate, but not just guessing randomly.
For the extant creatures you give them something they want to bite on and stick a measurement thing inside of that.
For extinct creatures see other comment. You compare anatomy and do math.
Soooo it’s not the number of this guy they can eat?