@psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years ago"They need us. We don't need them:" The fall of Twitter is making the trolls and grifters desperatewww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1751
arrow-up1751external-link"They need us. We don't need them:" The fall of Twitter is making the trolls and grifters desperatewww.salon.com@psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-square@uranibaba@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years ago but that something trained on public material is privately owned. Is that really a problem? Is a create something new based on public knowledge, should I not be able to profit from it? I learn to paint from YouTube, should I paint for free now? I’ll admit that the scope of ChatGPT is MUCH bigger than one person painting.
minus-squarePennomilinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 years agoI’d say that was a more controversial opinion. From a purist perspective I tend to believe that intellectual property in general is not ethical and stifles innovation.
Is that really a problem? Is a create something new based on public knowledge, should I not be able to profit from it?
I learn to paint from YouTube, should I paint for free now?
I’ll admit that the scope of ChatGPT is MUCH bigger than one person painting.
I’d say that was a more controversial opinion. From a purist perspective I tend to believe that intellectual property in general is not ethical and stifles innovation.