@simple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comexternal-linkmessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up1617 cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1617external-linkSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.com@simple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square127fedilink cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 months agoI disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoDon’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-22 months agoI disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoAnd that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months agoWhy are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 months agoPersonal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoBecause you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoWell, if they own the IP, under the framework under which we live, their will is factually more important. 🤷♀️
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoNo. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
Don’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
And that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
Personal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
Well, if they own the IP, under the framework under which we live, their will is factually more important. 🤷♀️
No. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.