@fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 2 months agoomglemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1447
arrow-up1447imageomglemmy.dbzer0.com@fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-square@ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglish51•2 months agoWhat if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
minus-squaresp3ctr4llinkfedilinkEnglish16•2 months ago… where x is positive. Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
minus-square@SpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish25•2 months agoNope, it still works even then.
What if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
… where x is positive.
Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
Nope, it still works even then.
NOW I get it. Thanks.