• @Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    334 days ago

    Can we just cut the back and forth and accept AI as another tool and let soulless AI content die off naturally. No one listens to music that’s all autotune after we decided that it was shit. The same will be said for AI.

    • SmokeyDope
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Some people need something to rage and virtue signal against. Those who work in private STEM sectors or took machine learning classes years before the LLM craze already understand the tool is here and are willing to learn to work with it if applicable in their job or daily life.

      Those who don’t understand anything about the science of machine learning and are angry at the how megacorporations got away with unconsentually scraping their copyright infringed data off the internet for the first iterations of training data still get to let off some steam by calling it ‘hyped autocomplete just as bad as NFTs that will never do what a person can’.

      If I were an artsy type whos first exposure to ML was having my work stolen followed by the thief bragging to my face about how copy protection laws dont matter to the powerful and now they can basically copy my honed style 1 to 1 with a computer to sell as an product, I would be unreasonably pissed too and not interested this whole 'AI’thing. Megacorps made chatGPT and stable diffusion using my work therefore AI bad. I get it.

      That said, I’m not an artsy type or an idealist. I’m a practical engineer who builds systems to process the flows of information and energy with the tools available at my dispersal. Theres more to machine learning than proprietary models made with stolen information to be sold to th masses. Instead models are just the next new way to process large datasets full of complicated information. Its just that now were taking cues from natures biological information processing systems. Whether such processes prove more certain and effective to the old analog and digital ways have yet to be seen. Perhaps using these new tools will open up entirely different ways of treating information for all of society. Perhaps it will be just another niche thing for researchers to write papers about. Time will tell.

      • @TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I can’t design a Minecraft house (art) without having access to Minecraft
        I value your discussion on this topic, even if I disagree, but this specific point isnt very good imo

          • @DrDystopia@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 days ago

            I used to play Minecraft and watch movies at the same time because neither required much mental processes, what did M$ do to MC?!

    • @Ilixtze@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I will see ai as a tool when it behaves like a tool to help human creativity and not syphon it to make derivative trash; AI has potential but current applications are very dependent on training and mimicking content that was already made. Why waste my life viewing that with so many great artists and writers out there?