@cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 1 month agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1755cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1755imageJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.ml@cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 1 month agomessage-square45fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-square@heavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink40•1 month agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-square@peoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish27•1 month agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanaellinkfedilink23•1 month agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-square@maiskanzler@feddit.nllinkfedilink2•edit-21 month agoPeople could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink11•1 month agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.