• @mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    I wonder, why is ‘literally’ so special?

    Someone steps out into unexpectedly cold weather and says, “It’s freezing out here.” But it’s not below freezing.

    Someone that hasn’t eaten all day takes a bite and says, “I was starving, this is the best burger I’ve ever tasted!” They weren’t really starving, and they probably didn’t just rank every burger they’ve eaten.

    We exaggerate and/or use words incorrectly for the effect so often, people are constantly using words “incorrectly” but then they say, “I’m literally dead right now.” and dictionaries change their definitions and people point out semantics. It’s like literally is figuratively magic.

    • @FrChazzz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1720 days ago

      It’s almost like language is radically democratic and words only mean what we largely agree they mean, with fluctuating cases based on particular contexts.

    • @theblips@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      920 days ago

      Yeah, somehow “literally” is the only word in a figure of speech that cannot be part of the figure at all! They are so smart for pointing that out

    • @Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      720 days ago

      “Freezing” is an exaggeration of “cold”, just like “starving” is an exaggeration of “hungry”. It’s “a lot of X”.

      “Literally” is not an exaggeration, it’s the opposite of “figuratively”. It’s “-X”.

      Those are two entirely different things. But of course inflammable means flammable.

    • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      118 days ago

      I think “literally” should be an exception because it’s the only word to clarify when we’re not speaking figuratively. It’s like making your safe word “fuck me harder”.