"no" banana to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 19 days agoChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square436fedilinkarrow-up1522
arrow-up1522imageChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.world"no" banana to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 19 days agomessage-square436fedilink
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]linkfedilink33•18 days ago2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
minus-square@hansolo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•18 days agoAll of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom. Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
minus-square@AA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•edit-218 days ago2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
minus-square@Burninator05@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•18 days agoFive is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it. One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.
2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
Getting aboard the #2 train
Yeah, longest tines wins.
All of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom.
Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
deleted by creator
Five is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it.
One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.