Ken27238 to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoPoor guyi.imgur.comimagemessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up11.77K
arrow-up11.77KimagePoor guyi.imgur.comKen27238 to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-squareExcellinkfedilink32•2 years agoSo you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?
minus-square@GentooPhysicist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•2 years agoAs a package maintainer, it’s a lot of fun sometimes!
minus-squareRaivoKullilinkfedilink3•edit-22 years agoI bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha
minus-square@GentooPhysicist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•2 years agoI’ve actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers
minus-squareRaivoKullilinkfedilink3•2 years agoFlatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.
So you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?
“It works on my machine”
He said the thing!
Packagers job to make it fit their distro, innit?
As a package maintainer, it’s a lot of fun sometimes!
I bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha
I’ve actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers
Flatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.
Username checks out