• @Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It works better for me as an app. I don’t like my browsers to be cluttered like that. But if it fits your usecase

        • ripcord
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          That’s why I like Chrome’s (and various Chromium browsers’) ability to app-ify sites. Will create a .app in MacOS, .desktop in Linux, etc. Launches as what looks like an independent app with its own dock/launcher icon. Utilizes most of their PWA stuff.

          Sadly, it looks like Chrome has hidden the option completely in the latest version unless you set a flag that will probably go away in a few releases. Edge makes it pretty clear.

          I wish Firefox would bring the feature back. They deprecated it years ago and I use it heavily (only reason/time I use Chromium stuff on most of my machines)

          • @Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I know it from Android and I was using it quite frequently as well. But in my opinion it’s better as a website alternative, compared to being a complete replacement for apps. Things are less buggy and more smooth for me that way.

        • TigrisMorte
          link
          fedilink
          511 months ago

          I fail to understand how opening a web site, which is all a browser does, can be defined as ‘cluttered’, but my use case is security while appears yours is to let corpos rummage through your files.

          • @Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            911 months ago

            It’s inconvenient and disorganized to have it as an extra tab (taking up tab space) or browser window (same symbols), also it runs smoother for me within the app.

            but my use case is security while appears yours is to let corpos rummage through your files

            I care about UX & seems like I’m not the only one at that. If I would care about privacy and security I wouldn’t use discord, but matrix or sth.

        • @AeroLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          It’s spyware that watches what software you use and sends that info back to their servers.

        • @HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          It works better only because they intentionally hamstring the browser so you’ll do exactly that.

      • etrotta
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        Why would you want to block their telemetry?
        It is not like they’re using it to serve ads to you, and it should be better for everyone for developers to make decisions based on how users are actually using their app, no?

        • conciselyverbose
          link
          fedilink
          2311 months ago

          It’s simple. Nothing that happens on my device is their data.

          Any telemetry that isn’t explicitly opt in with zero consequence for not doing so should be the kind of illegal that gets every asset your company owns seized immediately for non-compliance. All user data collection is spyware.

          • TigrisMorte
            link
            fedilink
            1111 months ago

            “even if you don’t use them to serve ads”, Which they do, just indirectly.

        • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          911 months ago

          You kidding? That’s literally a troijan horse.

          Imagine you buy a new showerhead and it came with a hidden camera sending data to the seller. The camera is enabled by default, with toggle hidden and difficult to find.

          This is what it is when you enable telemetry by default.

        • @cmrss2@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          The desktop client logs and sends lists of currently running processes by default, and they also collect usage data (which channels you open, how long for, who you’re interacting with). In the settings, there’s literally an option for “Use data to customize my Discord experience”. And sure, they don’t show ads, but their third-party integrations do. Article with sources

          In the end, processing and storing millions of texts, images, videos and files permanently, and hosting all those live voice and video calls, and making updates to the clients, will always cost more than what they get from Nitro and server boosting. Discord isn’t profitable; they have to make the deficit up to shareholders somehow.

      • @Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        Fair, but from a UX and technical perspective it’s a pain in the ass to use it like that

        • Dojan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          At my old workplace I used it in the browser daily. Wasn’t really an issue at all.

    • @MakeItCount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      Yes as I manly use it on phone

      So for the once on a blue moon when I’ll open discord on my PC, the browser is enough

    • @Durotar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 months ago

      Discord is a web app, there’s no other way. You either use your main browser or the one they’re bundling it with.

      • @Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If it’s just a WebApp, then why does one of the commenters have issues to run it without the browser?

        See: https://feddit.de/comment/2192027

        Edit: And I know that you’re right technically, still there is a difference in how you run it when using a browser vs Webapp.

        • @Durotar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          Theoretically, it may have additional features when it’s bundled with Electron, but ultimately there’s nothing wrong with running it in the browser.

          • @Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Nah I know there’s nothing wrong with it. I was just surprised so many people do it. But I guess we have a privacy-aware tech bubble here

        • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          711 months ago

          It’s not a laptop. Not sure why that would matter though. The browser version works fine. If it didn’t, that wouldn’t be my pc’s fault, it would be discord’s.

          • @Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I obviously meant any computer besides phones/tablets. Never heard of anyone that had less problems on the website, that’s just why I was wondering…

            • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 months ago

              Well, it’s a home built machine. Like all computers it has random weird issues. Just was trying to say that sometimes the unexpected thing will work better. Because had I not experienced that with discord, I would’ve assumed the desktop app should be better.

      • @anlumo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        That’s my experience on my machine running Ubuntu. The reason was that Discord ran in their snap sandbox, while my browser is not sandboxed. This leads to the sandboxes app not working together with xdg-desktop-portal, which means that screen sharing doesn’t work.