Pretty much title!

I’d love to support the developer, but I don’t feel like dropping $100 right now.

  • @BadAdvice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 years ago

    It’s a cash grab. The ad revenue supports the developer. The $20/year is just a better bulk deal for the devs because they arent subject to the whims of people buying ads. The only interesting bit for me is if the $100 app lasts 5 years in its current form or if they’ll try to charge more for features down the line.

    • pitninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      452 years ago

      Just going off the 10+ year history we had with this developer on Reddit, he has operated in good faith thus far and added features to Pro without charging for it, so I don’t think he’ll do that. But who knows. You’re buying today with no future guarantees. At least this time we know there’s no central organization that can pull the rug out from under Lemmy.

    • @Deca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      352 years ago

      $20 to get rid of ads forever on an app that you use daily is a fair price. No one gets lynched for subscribing to YouTube premium for $14/mo just to get rid of ads

        • @Deca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          122 years ago

          How so? Also Spotify Premium at $13/mo when there’s a free version supported by ads

          • @yesterdayshero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 years ago

            How much does Sync pay to host all the content for users to browse? How much does Sync pay content creators for that content? How much does Sync spend on creating content for the platform?

            Don’t get me wrong, I think devs should get paid for their work. If you’re happy to pay what’s being asked and see value in it, that’s great. But your comparison isn’t accurate.

            • @spongebue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              112 years ago

              Development and hosting are different expenses, but they’re still expenses. I also find it interesting that you call out the “content creators” as being on a certain level, but app creators aren’t?

            • @Deca@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              7
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Does it matter to the average user? I’m simply giving numbers to put into perspective the lengths people will go for an ad-free experience

              When people buy premium, they’re not doing it to support Google’s servers, they’re paying to get rid of ads at a whopping $14 per month when they could be using the app for free

              • @yesterdayshero@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Yeah. It actually kinda does matter. Otherwise you may as well compare it to leasing a car. When you lease a car you no longer need to see ads on the train or bus.

                You’re comparing the cost users are willing to pay to remove ads, but services like YouTube have to pay for things that Sync doesn’t. So the cost I might be willing to pay for YouTube Premium is different, as they’re fundamentally different products. There’s a hell of a lot more that goes into providing YouTube and Spotify, than there is to providing a UI wrapper for Lemmy.

                Edit: You should be comparing the cost of Sync to other Lemmy apps. It’s interesting you jumped to a completely different service when there’s direct competitors to Sync you’ve ignored.

    • @BowserDelta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      Pretty sure the remove ads is lifetime not yearly (I can’t check as I’m subscribed to Ultra). I think anyway. Ultra is the subscription model.

  • @Annoyed_Crabby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    You can pay the yearly one and see how it goes in one year, it’s cheaper than ad-free and also with extra feature, more bang for the buck i’d say

    • *Tagger*
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 years ago

      What financial model would you like sync to operate under?

        • *Tagger*
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 years ago

          But that would exclude people who don’t want to or can’t afford the subscription.

          This way LJDawson is letting people choose.

            • @MrLuemasG@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              152 years ago

              Connect is great.

              Sync is great.

              Just let people browse in peace. This has been the worst week Lemmy has had because it’s all bitching and counter bitching about the bitching.

    • Leuthil
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think the dev pays for Imgur and other media hosting site APIs so that is also a factor. No other app displays media as integrated as Sync.

      • @limerod@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I just tried uploading a picture and it was uploaded to my home instance for sharing. I do not see where imgur comes in the equation.

  • @1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    I also want to support but the price is ridiculous.

    It’s by far the best app but lifetime ultra for 120+ dollars? That’s way too much.

    $50 dollars is a reasonable price for this.

    • @limerod@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      I think he factored in 5-10 years of server costs by lifetime members and also his own price which he thinks is reasonable.