• El Barto
      link
      fedilink
      591 year ago

      Wait, wait, don’t confuse terms. I wouldn’t want to hear the use of enshitification the same way people are wrongly using “gaslighting.”

      Yes, I agree with you on the sentiment. Sucks that the same bs posted on reddit is creeping into lemmy.

      But the platform is the same. Lemmy is not adding ads, or removing api access or shit like that.

      • @FoxBJK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Sucks that the same bs posted on reddit is creeping into lemmy

        I’m seeing this in a few communities and it’s really frustrating. It’s not surprising, because it’s not like Lemmy has something built into the software to prevent it, it’s just disappointing.

    • @tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      221 year ago

      And python was created to teach programming. And PHP was something a guy used to maintain his webpage. If a language is useful it will gain popularity, and I never used a language which I didn’t find frustrating at some point.

        • @ActionHank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          True, but I see this quote repeated so often that it kind of bugs me. It seems to be used in a thought-terminating way. As if we shouldn’t criticize languages. As if they aren’t tools that are able to be improved upon, or they’re all made equal. But I’m sure Bjarne Stroustrup needs to fend off hostility and unfair criticism as much as any programmer with a successful language.

          • 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            oh i never considered that reading of the quote

            i read it as more: complaints about a language, particularly the amount of complaints, don’t mean it is a Bad Language that should be dropped in favor of something else

            in fact the complaints validate that the language is being used by people, and that–the number of people actually using the language to Do Things–is imo a decent proxy metric for the usefulness of the language

            so please complain about your languages’ shortcomings! i hate so many things about terraform / sh / python / golang / java and will gladly rant at length, and then go right back to using them

            except groovy

            fuck groovy

    • @ShunkW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Yeah. I don’t like writing JavaScript and I hate when I’m forced to use it to do something that could be handled otherwise except reasons. But especially with later versions it’s not the worst thing in the world. I work in ruby on rails and love hotwire that lets me avoid js more than before. But still js isn’t literally Hitler like people make it out to be

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    Wrong, annoying animations was Flash’s thing. Javascript was made for annoying popups and alert boxes

    • @float@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Also for these animated status line texts that were supposed to show what’s being loaded currently.

    • @bjornp_@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      I heard they’re looking to add typing to JavaScript in a very similar style as TypeScript. Basically running TypeScript in the browser without tsc.

      There’s at least a proposal which I hope they’ll continue with.

  • I was there for the first wave of SPAs, I even learned angularJs and Knockout. It did feel like a major atep forward, being able to make highly interactive applications. However, things quickly went off the rails when the tools stopped being about managing heavy client state, and became the default for everything, even when it ment using JavaScript to build extremely basic functionally browsers did natively with html, but extremely worse(e.g. navigation). The modern Web really is a victim of hype and trends.

    Unless your app needs to work offline, or you have to manage dozens of constantly changing client side data points concurrently, your site doesn’t need to be a big heavy js framework. My rule is if it looks like Google Maps, you need a SPA. if it looks like Gmail you need REST/HATEOS. and if it looks like google’s mainpage, you need a server side rendering.

    At some point you might see the light, and go back to making your websites simpler, but Im not hopeful. Until then I’m building the majority of things with HTMX and alpineJs.

  • FeyterM
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    I thought that’s what GIF was created for… Even if the original introduction of it is saying something completely different.

  • wia
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Doing Odin Project now and the constant shiting on JS online is sort of crushing my motivation. 😫

    • @BrucePotality@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 year ago

      Don’t worry about, JS is a fine language and is used by all of the top companies. If you want to get a job as a software developer you have decent odds if you learn JS

      • @FoxBJK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        As someone currently job hunting - native JS isn’t enough anymore. Everyone wants React devs. I see some posts for Vue or Angilar and sometimes even TypeScript but the vast majority want React coders now.

        • @towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Very true.
          If you are learning JavaScript, typescript is absolutely worth learning as well.
          React and Vue have some additional paradigms, but it is basically just JavaScript/typescript.
          It’s a lot to learn all in one step.

          I guess it’s like trying to learn C# and Unity all in one

    • @garyyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      261 year ago

      If you don’t hate a programming language you simply haven’t used it enough or are delusional. Every language sucks in its own special way, js ain’t special.

      • @Reliant1087@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I agree with you that every language has its flaws but JS feels like it was a hodgepodge created without any design philosophy in mind. I don’t use C or lisp in day to day work but I can appreciate their philosophies and power. Can’t say the same about JS.

        • fkn
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          That’s because it literally is the result of mozila, Microsoft and later Google fighting about what the right language choices were/are. Browser detection scripts and shims are still a thing, but back in the day we had to code that shit by hand every, and I mean every, minor version release of every browser.

          • @Reliant1087@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is super interesting. But why isn’t HTML or CSS a similar mess? I found their structure to be more logical than JS. Parts of JS feels like it’s intended as a backend language but parts of it don’t.

            • fkn
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Wait, you don’t think html is a mess? Lol.

              Css benefited from coming much later than the other two… But it also has issues.

                • fkn
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Lol. That’s like saying js is ok as long as you never use the parts that 90% of js developers use.

    • @ursakhiin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      JS is fine. But as with any tool it’s not the best for every scenario.

      The flak JS tends to get us mostly because of the rise of popularity is Node.js leading to backend JavaScript beginning commonplace. which it’s overall a poor choice for backend when compared to many other languages as the strengths that JS has are more tailored to frontend.

    • KaynA
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      Don’t let it get to you. This is mostly just a circlejerk by people who don’t even use JS themselves.

    • @glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Honest answer: JS is a shitty language and I despise it. BUT you can learn a ton of stuff with that, all the features (loops, conditions, variables, etc.) that exist in other languages. You will hate JS one day too, but right now it’s good to learn, and when you’ll switch to other languages, you’ll be happy you learned something.

      So yes, JS sucks, but no, it won’t be useless for your future. Keep on working, programming is really fun.

  • voxel
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    css can do animations, and it’s much more performant then js. I hate how over-used JavaScript is on “modern” websites.
    some websites are even straight up unusable or don’t display anything with js disabled…

    • @dukk@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Some websites, JavaScript is necessary for doing things without overloading a server. Mostly SPAs/PWAs and such. I’m using Voyager for Lemmy right now, which needs JS, but it gives me a great experience.

      But yeah, JS is often overused. Luckily, with new technologies coming out like Astro and HTMX, we should hopefully start seeing less JavaScript on pages that don’t need it.