western tankies especially can be very weird

Right, and they call anyone who disagrees with them, even actual communists, “McCarthyists” 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Seriously though, anyone who sees any reason whatsoever for communists to support the Iranian government mustn’t have a single fucking clue what communism is about… They’re a fucking joke (if only they didn’t go around giving leftists such a bad name)…

That’s a fantastic, and not at all surprising piece of information though, thanks for sharing!

Damn, based.

It should be noted that the Tudeh party has it’s HQ in Europe, hence them being all Bertie Big Bollocks about this news. They are banned in Iran.

The communists also helped overthrow the CIA puppet regime in the first place, which seems to have helped them not one jot.

Tankies are people who claim to be communists, but who exclusively support authoritarians and their oppressive regimes, past and present, because these authoritarians call themselves communists (think believing Nazis were socialists because it was in their party name), even though their actions have nothing at all to do with communism, and fascists co-opting leftist language to gain power being a well documented phenomenon.

It’s pretty easy to tell really: if a project is/was stateless, classless, and moneyless - congratulations, it’s almost certainly communism, and those who support it are communists (or possibly one of several varieties of anarchist, like myself).

However if one or any of those conditions aren’t met, and/or there is a single dictator or a small group of cronies holding on to power claiming they’ve been met, but the reality is clearly different - congratulations, you basically have run of the mill fascism on your hands and those who support it are tankies (who, as I pointed out in OP, almost always speak up and in defence of a “dear leader” but never in defence of the people themselves, because all they care about is the regime, not the people living under it).

In the case of the fediverse, there are a couple of dedicated instances almost exclusively occupied by tankies, who have made it their goal to essentially troll and brigade anyone who doesn’t agree with their, frankly bizarre, views (calling it “dialectics” to make themselves feel better). They’re generally easy to avoid though, by blocking individuals, or their entire instance.

From what I’ve been told, it originally was communist countries that use tanks against their people (like Tienanmen Square). It’s getting muddled by the countries that use tanks against their people, so I don’t know what it has become.

To my understanding this means historically a western communist who supported the USSR’s interventions (with tanks, hence the name) in Eastern European countries (Hungary, Czechoslovakia, maybe also East Germany) when the Warsaw Pact was a thing. More broadly someone who thinks the Soviet Union was a good regime.

My understanding is that the name itself is from older onion articles where when they needed an evil corporation name that is what they used. So they are indeed super fans.

Link about the buyout

Alright, I’ll bite.

How are people misinterpreting the Khamenei regime’s human rights issues (particularly against women)? And by “people” I, of course, mean orgs like Amnesty International.

Here is some “propaganda” for you to refute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Iran

God forbid a woman shows their hair, am I right?

Wanna ask Mahsa Amini about that? Oh, you can’t because she got killed for not covering her hair?

Brutal, isn’t it?

he says while looking into a mirror

Decided to glance into your comment history and phew, you are one angry little individual.

BUT maybe you have your reasons, many of us do. However, it’s important to be angry for the right reasons, at the right people.

Yeah, imagine being you.

Awww, are you sad the butcher of tehran finally met his end? Have you ever talked to any Iranian about the IRR?

Just because one evil prick is still alive doesn’t mean we can’t cheer that a different evil prick died.

if there was any consistency to zizek and other “psychoanalysts” they would come up with a convoluted explanation for the psychological condition that causes leftists (hopefully meaning people interested in decolonization and antiimperialism) to delude themselves into thinking zizek and the onion are on their side, but not the leaders of the few countries in the world supporting the palestinian struggle for liberation

perhaps you don’t believe there is any revolutionary potential in iran and it’s better off a crumpled up state like libya, where pure leftism can finally emerge from the ashes. i like seeing people slosh around from third worldism to anarchism and other stuff searching for an explanation of why they found a based way to agree with neocons so i’d love to hear it

Sold shitloads of suicide drones to Russia and went on an absolute crusade against women’s rights.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1988_executions_of_Iranian_political_prisoners

No, comedy is all about timing.

And repetition.

And rules of threes

And subverting expectations.

And repetition.